最新资讯
dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

CFO 与 LLM 的相遇

原文 我的收藏

arXiv 论文《CFOs Meet LLMs》提出让 LLM 扮演特定公司在特定日期的 CFO,对 2002–2025 年 Duke–Federal Reserve CFO 调查的每位上市公司 CFO 生成经济乐观度评分。结果显示该评分能预测 CFO 的实际回答,在控制企业、年季固定效应及人类 CFO 滞后回答后关系依然存在,且准确率随输入信息增加而提升;对自身企业乐观度和企业营收预期两个问题也呈现相同模式。作者认为在适当条件下,LLM 未来或可作为高管的“数字孪生”,为金融研究与政策提供可扩展、高频的预期数据。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(q-fin.CP),作者为 John R. Graham、Campbell R. Harvey、Manish Jha,摘要明确:用 LLM 扮演特定公司在特定日期的 CFO,对 2002–2025 年 Duke–Federal Reserve CFO 调查的受访者生成经济乐观度评分,并检验其能否预测 CFO 实际回答;在加入企业、年季固定效应及人类 CFO 滞后回答控制变量后关系仍存在,且准确率随提供给 LLM 的信息增加而提高。新信息在于把 LLM 用作高管“数字孪生”以生成可扩展、高频的预期数据,属金融研究与政策应用方向;局限是摘要仅称“may in the future”,未给出实际部署或因果结论,且为预印本、未经同行评审。

72

正文

Quantitative Finance > Computational Finance arXiv:2606.13812 (q-fin) [Submitted on 11 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 21 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:CFOs Meet LLMs Authors:John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, Manish Jha View a PDF of the paper titled CFOs Meet LLMs, by John R. Graham and 2 other authors View PDF Abstract:Business sentiment is a closely watched economic signal, but measuring it is slow and costly: surveys typically reach only a few hundred firms, arrive periodically, and take time to compile. We show that large language models hold the potential to address these shortcomings. We prompt an LLM to role-play as the CFO of a specific company on a specific date, for every public-company CFO who responded to the Duke--Federal Reserve CFO Survey between 2002 and 2025, and answer a question about economy-wide optimism. The LLM-generated optimism score predicts the individual CFO's actual answer, even in specifications that include firm and year-quarter fixed effects as well as a control variable measuring the human CFO's lagged response. Accuracy increases with the information provided to the LLM, and the relation persists under quarterly aggregation. We find the same patterns hold for two other questions measuring CFO expectations: the respondent's optimism about their own firm and their expectation of own-firm revenues. With appropriate conditioning, LLMs may in the future be able to serve as digital twins of executives, offering scalable, high-frequency expectations data for financial research and policy. Comments: Subjects: Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); General Finance (q-fin.GN) Cite as: arXiv:2606.13812 [q-fin.CP] (or arXiv:2606.13812v2 [q-fin.CP] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.13812 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Manish Jha [view email] [v1] Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:32:12 UTC (300 KB) [v2] Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:49:48 UTC (322 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled CFOs Meet LLMs, by John R. Graham and 2 other authors View PDF view license Current browse context: q-fin.CP new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: q-fin q-fin.GN References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM CFO 与 LLM 的相遇 09-22 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容