智能体
arxiv.org ·
@Chang Xia, Leilei Ouyang, Huimin Wang, Yong Zhao, Kang Li
结构化辩论混合智能体框架用于复杂临床诊断决策支持
本文提出Debate-Mixture-of-Agents (DMoA)框架,通过结构化角色交互支持迭代诊断推理。在297个罕见病和1719个挑战性病例上,DMoA将最可能诊断准确率提升10.21个百分点,安全率提升11.36个百分点,优于GPT-4o基线。消融实验表明性能提升源于结构化工作流,而非单纯增加模型或输出长度。
AI推荐理由 该论文提出结构化辩论混合智能体框架用于临床诊断,在297个罕见病和1719个挑战性病例上,相比GPT-4o基线将诊断准确率提升10.21个百分点,安全率提升11.36个百分点,具有明确实验证据和实际应用价值。
75
正文
计算机科学 > 计算与语言
arXiv:2609.05069 (cs)
[提交于2026年9月4日]
标题:用于复杂临床诊断决策支持的结构化辩论-多智能体混合框架
作者:Chang Xia, Leilei Ouyang, Huimin Wang, Yong Zhao, Kang Li
查看论文PDF,标题为“用于复杂临床诊断决策支持的结构化辩论-多智能体混合框架”,作者:Chang Xia等4人
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
摘要:大型语言模型(LLMs)在医疗任务中显示出潜力,但其单轮问答格式并不能反映临床诊断的实际执行方式。因此,它们在复杂的诊断环境中仍然受限。我们开发了辩论-多智能体混合(DMoA),这是一种新颖的多智能体框架,通过结构化的基于角色的交互来支持迭代诊断推理。基础模型和DMoA在297个罕见病病例和1,719个具有挑战性的病例上进行了评估。在两个数据集中,DMoA相比GPT-4o基线,最可能诊断准确率提高了10.21个百分点,安全率提高了11.36个百分点。消融实验表明,这些收益并非仅仅由于使用了更多模型或更长的输出,也反映了结构化工作流程的贡献。进一步的分析考察了框架设计、基础模型选择和令牌预算如何影响性能。DMoA在4*2结构、更强的基础模型和更大的令牌预算下表现更好。这些发现证明了DMoA在临床任务中的潜力,并建议进一步研究多智能体框架。
评论:
主题:
计算与语言 (cs.CL);人工智能 (cs.AI)
引用为:
arXiv:2609.05069 [cs.CL]
(或
arXiv:2609.05069v1 [cs.CL] 用于此版本)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05069
聚焦以了解更多
arXiv发布的DOI通过DataCite(待注册)
提交历史
来自:Chang Xia [查看电子邮件]
[v1]
2026年9月4日星期五 12:28:31 UTC (8,632 KB)
全文链接:
访问论文:
查看论文PDF,标题为“用于复杂临床诊断决策支持的结构化辩论-多智能体混合框架”,作者:Chang Xia等4人
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
TeX源
查看许可证
当前浏览上下文:
cs.CL
新
|
最近
| 2026-09
更改浏览方式:
cs
cs.AI
参考文献与引用
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
导出BibTeX引用
加载中...
BibTeX格式引用
×
加载中...
数据提供:
书签
书目工具
书目与引用工具
书目浏览器切换
书目浏览器(什么是浏览器?)
关联论文切换
关联论文(什么是关联论文?)
Litmaps切换
Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?)
scite.ai切换
scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?)
代码、数据、媒体
与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体
alphaXiv切换
alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?)
代码链接切换
CatalyzeX论文代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub切换
DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?)
GotitPub切换
Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?)
Huggingface切换
Hugging Face(什么是Hugging Face?)
ScienceCast切换
ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?)
演示
演示
Replicate切换
Replicate(什么是Replicate?)
Spaces切换
Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?)
Spaces切换
TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?)
相关论文
推荐与搜索工具
链接到Influence Flower
Influence Flower(什么是Influence Flowers?)
核心推荐器切换
CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?)
作者
会议
机构
主题
关于arXivLabs
arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目
arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。
与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都接受并认可我们的开放、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私价值观。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。
有一个能为arXiv社区增加价值的项目想法?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。
这篇论文的哪些作者是背书人?|
禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.05069 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026]
Title:A Structured Debate-Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Complex Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support
Authors:Chang Xia, Leilei Ouyang, Huimin Wang, Yong Zhao, Kang Li
View a PDF of the paper titled A Structured Debate-Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Complex Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support, by Chang Xia and 4 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) show potential for medical tasks, but their single-turn question-answer format does not reflect how clinical diagnosis is performed in practice. As a result, they remain limited in complex diagnostic settings. We developed Debate-Mixture-of-Agents (DMoA), a novel multi-agent framework that structures role-based interaction to support iterative diagnostic reasoning. Base models and DMoA were evaluated on 297 rare disease cases and 1,719 challenging cases. Across both datasets, DMoA improved most likely diagnosis accuracy by 10.21 percentage points and safety rate by 11.36 percentage points over GPT-4o baseline. Ablation experiments showed that the gains were not simply due to the use of more models or longer outputs, but also reflected the contribution of the structured workflow. Further analyses examined how framework design, base model choice, and token budget affected performance. DMoA performed better with a 4*2 structure, stronger base models, and a larger token budget. These findings demonstrate the potential of DMoA for clinical tasks and suggest further investigation of multi-agent frameworks.
Comments:
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.05069 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.05069v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05069
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Chang Xia [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 4 Sep 2026 12:28:31 UTC (8,632 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled A Structured Debate-Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Complex Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support, by Chang Xia and 4 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)