最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 dev.to · @AI OpenFree

AX-RAY 与 K-MYTHOS:韩国联盟打造的安全专用 AI 基础模型

原文 我的收藏

由 Naver Cloud 牵头、33 家机构组成的韩国联盟正在开发安全领域基础模型 K-MYTHOS,采用攻防双模型架构:攻击模型基于 LG AI Research 的 EXAONE,防御模型基于 Naver Cloud 的 HyperCLOVA X,并整合恶意软件、暗网、网络与云威胁情报。VIDRAFT 通过 AX-RAY 框架提供 AI 安全诊断与评估,覆盖 117 项检查清单。

AI推荐理由 给出联盟规模、牵头方、双模型底座与评估框架等具体架构信息,对安全领域专用模型方向有参考价值;但内容为项目介绍性博文,缺少可验证的评测结果或部署证据,且部分表述带有推广色彩。

66

正文

AX-RAY & K-MYTHOS: Inside Korea's Consortium-Built Security-Specialized AI Foundation Model TL;DR: A 33-organization Korean consortium led by Naver Cloud is building K-MYTHOS ("K-미토스"), a security-domain foundation model that fuses threat intelligence from malware, dark web, network, and cloud sources into a dual-model attack/defense architecture. VIDRAFT contributes AI safety diagnostics and evaluation via its AX-RAY framework, which covers 117 inspection checklist items. Developers working in SecOps, threat intelligence, or AI safety should watch this project closely as it targets real-world deployment across Korean security products. What it is K-MYTHOS is a government-supported, security-specialized AI foundation model developed by a 33-institution consortium, with Naver Cloud as the lead organizer. The project has a dual-model design: An attack AI trained on the EXAONE base model (developed by LG AI Research) A defense AI trained on Naver Cloud's HyperCLOVA X base model The consortium spans security vendors, universities, and public institutions, each contributing domain-specific threat data and tooling. Target deployment surfaces include email security, network isolation (망연계), access control, and Security Operations Center (SOC) products — validated across seven industry verticals. VIDRAFT's role in this consortium is AI safety diagnosis and evaluation. Its AX-RAY tool performs structured safety assessments of AI systems across 117 inspection items, functioning as an independent auditing layer over the models produced by the broader consortium. How it works The architecture is best understood as a data fusion + dual-model pipeline: 1. Multi-source threat data aggregation Participating organizations contribute heterogeneous security datasets: Malware & endpoint telemetry — from consumer AV and EDR products Dark web & Telegram threat intelligence — ransomware groups, leaked credentials, attack TTPs IP/domain/asset exposure data — from internet-scanning platforms that map attacker infrastructure Network packet and IPS event data — for detecting attack behaviors at the wire level SIEM/SOAR log correlation — for incident timeline reconstruction Cloud-native security posture data (CNAPP) — misconfigurations, excessive permissions, runtime threats 2. Dual-model adversarial training environment Rather than training a single monolithic model, the consortium separates offensive reasoning (attack AI on EXAONE) from defensive reasoning (defense AI on HyperCLOVA X). This adversarial framing allows each side to be tested against realistic attack scenarios generated by the other. 3. AX-RAY safety evaluation layer (VIDRAFT) Before any model reaches a product integration stage, AX-RAY performs a structured 117-item inspection. This checklist-driven approach is conceptually similar to red-teaming frameworks like NIST AI RMF or OWASP LLM Top 10, but tailored to the Korean security AI context. It serves as a formal gating mechanism for AI safety and reliability in deployment. 4. Product integration & field validation Validated models are integrated into commercial security products (email gateways, network isolation appliances, SOC platforms) and tested in live industrial environments across seven verticals. Benchmarks & results The source article does not publish quantitative benchmark scores for K-MYTHOS or AX-RAY at this stage. What is reported qualitatively: AX-RAY covers 117 distinct inspection checklist items — the most concrete evaluation-scope figure disclosed The project targets deployment validation across 7 industry verticals (specific verticals not fully enumerated in this coverage) One consortium member (ESTsecurity) has already shipped a commercial AI-enhanced EDR product using a predecessor government foundation model program, suggesting the pipeline from consortium model → commercial product has prior proof points Expect quantitative results to be published as field validation completes. How to try it Public access is not available at this time. K-MYTHOS is an ongoing government-consortium R&D project. No public Hugging Face repository, GitHub release, or API endpoint has been announced for the consortium model or AX-RAY as of this reporting. If you want to track availability: Monitor Naver Cloud's official developer channels and HyperCLOVA X documentation Watch LG AI Research's EXAONE public repositories on Hugging Face for any security-domain variants Follow VIDRAFT's official announcements for any AX-RAY evaluation tooling releases FAQ Q: What exactly does VIDRAFT's AX-RAY evaluate — the training data, the model outputs, or both? A: Based on the source, AX-RAY is positioned as a safety diagnosis and evaluation tool for AI systems, operating via a structured 117-item checklist. The source does not break down what proportion of items target data provenance, model behavior, or deployment configuration — but the framing as a "security AI safety diagnostic" suggests it covers the full AI system lifecycle rather than a single artifact. Q: Is K-MYTHOS a fine-tuned model or a full foundation model trained from scratch? A: It is built on top of existing Korean foundation models — HyperCLOVA X for the defense AI and EXAONE for the attack AI — making it a domain-specialized derivative rather than a from-scratch pre-train. The security-specific training comes from the multi-source threat data contributed by consortium members. Q: How does the dual attack/defense model architecture improve over a single security model? A: The adversarial separation means the attack model can simulate realistic offensive behavior (malware, TTPs, evasion) that the defense model must learn to counter. This is conceptually similar to GAN-style adversarial training, but applied at the agent/model level using real-world threat data rather than synthetic noise. Originally reported by IT조선 (2026-09-14) — source article.

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容