最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org · @Abhisek Dash

基础模型能否胜任内容审核?指令驱动与示例驱动策略落地的对比评估

原文 我的收藏

论文系统比较视觉语言模型(VLM)内容审核的两种引导范式:从政策条文推理的指令驱动,与从既往判例泛化的示例驱动。研究基于新构建的 ModerationBench,包含 4000 条来自 Bluesky 平台、经人工标注的真实帖子。实验显示基础模型可显著优于 Bluesky 已部署的审核系统,在 Random Posts 上 F1 从 0.22 提升至约 0.60,两种范式峰值效果相当。作者据此讨论可扩展、可适配的政策落地路径。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新论文,提出 ModerationBench(4000 条 Bluesky 人工标注帖)并系统对比指令驱动与示例驱动两种 VLM 内容审核范式,报告基础模型在 Random Posts 上 F1 约 0.60、接近三倍于 Bluesky 已部署系统(0.22)。具体新信息是基准与两种范式的可比峰值效果;局限是结论基于单一平台与特定基准,摘要未给出跨平台泛化或部署成本证据。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.10410v1 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Sep 2026] Title:Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization Authors:Ayan Majumdar, Shounak Paul, Pushpdeep Singh, Ines Abdelaziz, Sayeh Jarollahi, Seungeon Lee, Krishna P. Gummadi, Ingmar Weber, Abhisek Dash View a PDF of the paper titled Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization, by Ayan Majumdar and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The growing complexity of content moderation policies presents a critical challenge for their consistent operationalization. While foundation models possess the basic capabilities needed to confront this challenge, whether they can reliably moderate online content remains an unanswered question. In this paper, we systematically compare two competing paradigms for Vision-Language Model (VLM) guidance: an instruction-driven approach where models reason from policy precepts, and an example-driven approach where they generalize from prior precedents. We ground this investigation in ModerationBench, a new benchmark of 4,000 manually annotated, in-the-wild posts from the Bluesky platform. Our experiments reveal that foundation models can substantially outperform Bluesky's deployed moderation system, nearly tripling its $F_1$ score (0.60 vs. 0.22) on Random Posts in the benchmark, with both instruction- and example-driven paradigms achieving comparable peak effectiveness. Our findings thus chart a path toward reliable and adaptable policy operationalization at scale. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2609.10410 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.10410v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10410 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ayan Majumdar [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 16:30:15 UTC (3,713 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization, by Ayan Majumdar and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容