最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

一个可审查的 LLM 委员会用于多模型研究答案聚合

原文 我的收藏

论文提出可审查的 LLM Council,将多模型答案聚合拆为两阶段:analyst 把三个独立候选答案转为结构化状态,writer 基于该状态生成最终回答。在 DRACO 基准 100 个闭卷任务上,主评分 70.98,高于 GPT 和 Gemini 分别 6.18 与 8.34 分,与 Claude 相差 0.47 分(95% 配对区间 [-0.69,1.61]);补充对比中高于直接融合 1.87 分(区间 [0.33,3.48]),并覆盖 51.1% 仅被单一候选覆盖的正向评分标准(直接融合为 43.7%)。作者指出在 68 任务子集上直接融合得分更高,因此无法隔离 analyst 状态的效果;追踪案例展示了估计值、来源限定与选择决策如何经保存状态进入最终答案。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v5,2026-09-26 修订),提出可审查的 LLM Council 两阶段聚合流程(analyst 生成结构化状态、writer 据此成文),在 DRACO 基准 100 个闭卷任务上评估,主评分 70.98,高于 GPT 与 Gemini 分别 6.18 和 8.34 分,与 Claude 差 0.47 分(95% 配对区间 [-0.69,1.61]);补充对比中高于 direct fusion 1.87 分(区间 [0.33,3.48])。局限明确:作者自述在 68 任务子集上 direct fusion 更高,无法隔离 analyst 状态的作用,且为闭卷设定。信息密度高、有可复现附件,但属单篇预印本、未经同行评审,故未给更高分。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2604.02923 (cs) [Submitted on 3 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 26 Sep 2026 (this version, v5)] Title:An Inspectable LLM Council for Multi-Model Research Answer Aggregation Authors:Shuai Wu, Xue Li, Yanna Feng, Yufang Li, Zhijun Wang, Ran Wang View a PDF of the paper titled An Inspectable LLM Council for Multi-Model Research Answer Aggregation, by Shuai Wu and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Long-form research questions often require a single answer that combines details, reconciles conflicting estimates, and retains qualifications spread across several large language model (LLM) outputs. We present an inspectable LLM Council that separates synthesis into two stages: an analyst converts three independent candidate answers into a structured state, and a writer composes the final response from that state. We evaluate the workflow under closed-book conditions on 100 tasks from the Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivity (DRACO) benchmark, retaining 600 final answers, 100 analyst states, and 720 whole-answer judgments across the main and supplementary experiments. Under the primary rubric judge, Council scores 70.98, exceeding GPT and Gemini by 6.18 and 8.34 points; its 0.47-point difference from Claude has a 95% paired interval of $[-0.69,1.61]$. In the full supplementary comparison, Council scores 1.87 points above direct fusion (95% paired interval $[0.33,3.48]$) and covers 51.1% of positive rubric criteria covered by exactly one candidate, compared with 43.7% for direct fusion. On an exploratory 68-task subset with matching returned model labels, direct fusion scores higher, so the full comparison cannot isolate the analyst state's effect. Traced cases show how estimates, provenance qualifications, and selection decisions pass through the saved state into final answers. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.6; I.2.11 Cite as: arXiv:2604.02923 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2604.02923v5 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.02923 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Shuai Wu [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Apr 2026 09:40:43 UTC (192 KB) [v2] Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:07:06 UTC (192 KB) [v3] Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:11:17 UTC (145 KB) [v4] Sun, 5 Jul 2026 07:16:53 UTC (144 KB) [v5] Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:21:34 UTC (11,639 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled An Inspectable LLM Council for Multi-Model Research Answer Aggregation, by Shuai Wu and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Ancillary-file links: Ancillary files (details): LICENSE-CODE LICENSE-DATA README.md THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md analysis/diagnostics_v3.py analysis/reproduce_v3.py analysis/restore_records.py analysis/supplement.py analysis/test_diagnostics_v3.py analysis/test_reproduce_v3.py analysis/test_supplement_analysis.py data/task_manifest.csv data_records.json data_supplement/analysis/all_calls.csv data_supplement/analysis/costs.csv data_supplement/analysis/coverage.csv data_supplement/analysis/coverage_comparison.pdf data_supplement/analysis/coverage_comparison.png data_supplement/analysis/direction_agreement.csv data_supplement/analysis/length_and_score.pdf data_supplement/analysis/length_and_score.png data_supplement/analysis/length_differences.csv data_supplement/analysis/operations.csv data_supplement/analysis/paired_differences.pdf data_supplement/analysis/paired_differences.png data_supplement/analysis/primary_comparisons.csv data_supplement/analysis/primary_means.csv data_supplement/analysis/returned_label_comparisons.csv data_supplement/analysis/sample.csv data_supplement/analysis/scores.csv data_supplement/analysis/secondary_comparisons.csv data_supplement/analysis/settings.csv data_texts.json data_v3/analysis/configuration_scores.csv data_v3/analysis/coverage_rates.csv data_v3/analysis/dimension_contributions.csv data_v3/analysis/paired_comparisons.csv data_v3/analysis/retained_operations.csv data_v3/analysis/subgroup_scores.csv data_v3/analysis/task_differences.csv data_v3/source/draco_test.jsonl data_v3/stage1_solo_summary.csv data_v3/stage3_scores.csv experiments/records.py experiments/stage1_report.py experiments/stage1_solo.py experiments/stage2_council.py experiments/stage3_judge.py experiments/stage3_report.py experiments/supplement_api.py experiments/supplement_finish.py experiments/supplement_judgments.py experiments/supplement_preflight.py experiments/supplement_run.py experiments/test_stage1_solo.py experiments/test_stage2_council.py experiments/test_stage3_judge.py experiments/test_stage3_report.py experiments/test_supplement.py requirements.txt (55 additional files not shown) Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容