最新资讯
dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP theverge.com OpenAI 宣布数据中心项目不再与公职人员签署保密协议 dev.to NVIDIA 发布四个开放 Cosmos 3 仿真模型 dev.to 真实 MCP 客户端击穿我们服务器的五种方式 theverge.com Airbnb 正在开发 AI 旅行 agent,计划 2027 年上半年推出 wechat 这可能是美国AI最魔幻的一天。
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org · @Maxm Pan

ExplorationBench:在可验证异世界中衡量 AI 系统的探索能力

原文 我的收藏

论文提出 ExplorationBench,将科学探索评测转化为基于可验证 Alien Worlds 的具体框架:其规则可执行,答案可精确校验;且与熟悉知识冲突,仅靠记忆无法解题。基准包含两个沙盒:AlienCode(31 个发现目标、70 个任务)与 AlienLogic(24 个发现目标、70 个任务),每个沙盒提供有缺陷的手册、任务特定环境反馈和专用工具调用 schema,用于评估 AI 系统提出假设、设计实验并迭代的能力。

AI推荐理由 针对科学探索能力评测中“如何验证新假设”和“如何区分探索与预训练记忆”两大难题,提出基于可执行规则、且与常识冲突的 Alien Worlds 基准 ExplorationBench,含 AlienCode(31 个发现目标、70 个任务)与 AlienLogic(24 个发现目标、70 个任务)两个沙盒,每个沙盒提供有缺陷的手册、任务级环境反馈与专用工具调用 schema。设计上可精确校验答案并抑制记忆式作答,对 AI 探索与科学发现评测有实际价值。

75

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.30199v1 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:ExplorationBench: Measuring AI Systems' Exploration in Verifiable Alien Worlds Authors:Ming Zhang, Zhenghao Xiang, Peizhong Gao, Yujiong Shen, Yuhui Wang, Zhonghan Yue, Shihan Dou, Zhangyue Yin, Junjie Ye, Shichun Liu, Weihuang Zheng, Jiahao Chen, Jiayi Chen, Hongzhang Liu, Jiaqi Shao, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Suncong Zheng, Maxm Pan View a PDF of the paper titled ExplorationBench: Measuring AI Systems' Exploration in Verifiable Alien Worlds, by Ming Zhang and 19 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Scientific discovery begins where known problems end. There, AI systems must engage in exploration: framing hypotheses, designing experiments, and iterating on the results. However, evaluating this ability is difficult: (1) how to verify whether a genuinely new hypothesis holds, and (2) how to determine whether a system has discovered it through exploration or merely recalled related knowledge from pre-training data. To this end, we introduce ExplorationBench, which turns the wicked problem of evaluating scientific exploration into a concrete and tractable framework built on verifiable Alien Worlds: their rules are executable, so every answer can be checked exactly, and they conflict with familiar knowledge, so recall alone cannot solve the tasks. The benchmark contains two sandboxes, AlienCode (31 discovery targets, 70 tasks) and AlienLogic (24 discovery targets, 70 tasks). Each sandbox provides a flawed manual, task-specific environmental feedback, and a dedicated tool-call schema. Systems use these resources to explore the sandbox, then solve held-out tasks. We evaluate 10 AI systems and find that the strongest systems can acquire and apply unfamiliar rules, while performance varies substantially across trajectories and continued exploration can stall or reverse earlier gains. ExplorationBench represents a step towards AI systems that can acquire and apply genuinely new knowledge through exploration in unknown environments. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30199 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.30199v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30199 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ming Zhang [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:37:14 UTC (5,363 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled ExplorationBench: Measuring AI Systems' Exploration in Verifiable Alien Worlds, by Ming Zhang and 19 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容