行业动态
arxiv.org ·
@Benoit Corda
WearableQA:真实世界可穿戴数据健康推理基准
WearableQA基准包含4084个多项选择题,基于200个真实用户长达500天的可穿戴数据,评估AI系统对纵向健康数据的推理能力,涵盖数据推理与健康推理、单信号与跨信号等16种问题类型。
AI推荐理由 来自arXiv的学术论文,提出WearableQA基准,包含4084个问题,基于200个真实用户数据,评估AI对可穿戴数据的推理能力,具有创新性和实用性。
85
正文
计算机科学 > 计算与语言
arXiv:2609.05405v1 (cs)
[提交于2026年9月4日]
标题:WearableQA:真实世界可穿戴数据健康推理基准
作者:Ji Soo Lee, Xilun Chen, Pierce Chuang, Ashish Shenoy, Jason Wei, Dohwan Ko, Hyunwoo J. Kim, Benoit Corda
查看论文PDF,标题为WearableQA:真实世界可穿戴数据健康推理基准,作者Ji Soo Lee等7人
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
摘要:可穿戴传感技术的最新进展使得对生理和行为信号的连续监测成为可能,然而现有基准很少评估AI系统能否对真实用户的纵向可穿戴记录进行推理。我们引入了WearableQA,一个包含4,084个10选项多项选择题的基准,这些问题基于200名真实用户的可穿戴时间序列、血液生物标志物和人口统计数据构建,每位用户拥有长达500天的每日测量数据。WearableQA保留了真实可穿戴数据分布,包括设备噪声和个体间差异。为了评估不同的推理能力,我们引入了16种问题类型,沿两个互补轴组织:数据与健康推理,区分对纵向测量的计算与生理解释;以及单信号与跨信号推理,区分对单个信号的分析与多信号整合。为了大规模构建可靠问题,我们采用了双重基础框架,结合文献基础的生理发现与统计验证的人群基础生理模式。这使得我们能够捕捉真实世界可穿戴数据中观察到的有意义关系。对14个专有和开源LLM的评估表明,WearableQA能有效区分模型能力,性能范围从19.6%到72.9%,而随机猜测基线为10%。此外,WearableQA远未解决:大多数模型准确率低于60%。总体而言,WearableQA为评估LLM对真实世界可穿戴数据的推理提供了一个现实且诊断性的基准。
主题:
计算与语言 (cs.CL)
引用为:
arXiv:2609.05405 [cs.CL]
(或
arXiv:2609.05405v1 [cs.CL] 此版本)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05405
点击了解更多
arXiv发布的DOI via DataCite(待注册)
提交历史
来自:Xilun Chen [查看电子邮件]
[v1]
2026年9月4日星期五 17:52:37 UTC (4,014 KB)
全文链接:
访问论文:
查看论文PDF,标题为WearableQA:真实世界可穿戴数据健康推理基准,作者Ji Soo Lee等7人
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
TeX源
查看许可证
当前浏览上下文:
cs.CL
新
|
最近
| 2026-09
更改为浏览:
cs
参考文献与引用
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
导出BibTeX引用
加载中...
BibTeX格式引用
×
加载中...
数据提供:
书签
书目工具
书目与引用工具
书目浏览器切换
书目浏览器(什么是浏览器?)
关联论文切换
关联论文(什么是关联论文?)
Litmaps切换
Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?)
scite.ai切换
scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?)
代码、数据、媒体
与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体
alphaXiv切换
alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?)
代码链接切换
CatalyzeX论文代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub切换
DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?)
GotitPub切换
Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?)
Huggingface切换
Hugging Face(什么是Huggingface?)
ScienceCast切换
ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?)
演示
演示
Replicate切换
Replicate(什么是Replicate?)
Spaces切换
Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?)
Spaces切换
TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?)
相关论文
推荐与搜索工具
影响之花链接
影响之花(什么是影响之花?)
核心推荐切换
CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?)
作者
会议
机构
主题
关于arXivLabs
arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目
arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。
与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都接受并认可我们开放、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私的价值观。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。
有想法为arXiv社区增加价值吗?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。
哪些作者是本文的认可者?|
禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.05405v1 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026]
Title:WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data
Authors:Ji Soo Lee, Xilun Chen, Pierce Chuang, Ashish Shenoy, Jason Wei, Dohwan Ko, Hyunwoo J. Kim, Benoit Corda
View a PDF of the paper titled WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data, by Ji Soo Lee and 7 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recent advances in wearable sensing enable continuous monitoring of physiological and behavioral signals, yet existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether AI systems can reason over a real user's longitudinal wearable record. We introduce WearableQA, a benchmark comprising 4,084 10-option multiple-choice questions constructed from the wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics of 200 real users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. WearableQA preserves authentic wearable distributions that include device noise and inter-individual variability. To evaluate distinct reasoning capabilities, we introduce 16 question types organized along two complementary axes: data versus health reasoning, which distinguishes computation over longitudinal measurements from physiological interpretation; and single- versus cross-signal reasoning, which separates reasoning about individual signals from the integration of multiple signals. To construct reliable questions at scale, we adopt a dual-grounding framework that combines literature-grounded physiological findings with statistically validated population-grounded physiological patterns. This enables the capture of meaningful relationships observed in real-world wearable data. Evaluation of 14 proprietary and open-source LLMs demonstrates that WearableQA effectively differentiates model capabilities, with performance ranging from 19.6% to 72.9% against a 10% chance baseline. Moreover, WearableQA remains far from solved: most models achieve accuracies below 60%. Overall, WearableQA provides a realistic and diagnostic benchmark for evaluating LLM reasoning over real-world wearable data.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.05405 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.05405v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05405
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xilun Chen [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 4 Sep 2026 17:52:37 UTC (4,014 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data, by Ji Soo Lee and 7 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)