最新资讯
bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 analyticsindiamag.com 小语言模型可能重塑企业 AI 部署方式 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

IndicParam:面向低资源印度语言的大模型评测基准

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 IndicParam,一个人工整理的基准,包含 13,000 多道多选题,覆盖 11 种低资源及极低资源印度语言(尼泊尔语、古吉拉特语、马拉地语、奥里亚语,以及多格里语、迈蒂利语、拉贾斯坦语、梵语、博多语、桑塔利语、孔卡尼语),另含梵语-英语混合语料。作者评测了 20 个闭源与开源模型,结果显示表现最好的 Gemini-2.5 平均准确率为 58%,GPT-5 为 45%,DeepSeek-3.2 为 43.1%。每道题被标注为知识型或纯语言型,以区分事实回忆与语法能力,并测试列表匹配、断言-理由、序列排序等题型。论文称该基准揭示了跨语言迁移的局限,数据集与评测脚本已公开。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,摘要明确给出基准规模(13,000+ 道多选题、11 种语言)、评测模型数量(20 个)和具体准确率(Gemini-2.5 58%、GPT-5 45%、DeepSeek-3.2 43.1%),并区分知识型与语言型题目、覆盖多种题型,信息密度高、可验证。局限在于仅依据摘要,未提供数据集构建细节、标注一致性或基线复现结果,且低资源印度语言评测对多数开发者的直接落地价值有限。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2512.00333 (cs) [Submitted on 29 Nov 2025 (v1), last revised 12 Jan 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:IndicParam: Benchmark to evaluate LLMs on low-resource Indic Languages Authors:Ayush Maheshwari, Kaushal Sharma, Vivek Patel, Aditya Maheshwari View a PDF of the paper titled IndicParam: Benchmark to evaluate LLMs on low-resource Indic Languages, by Ayush Maheshwari and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:While large language models excel on high-resource multilingual tasks, low- and extremely low-resource Indic languages remain severely under-evaluated. We present IndicParam, a human-curated benchmark of over 13,000 multiple-choice questions covering 11 such languages (Nepali, Gujarati, Marathi, Odia as low-resource; Dogri, Maithili, Rajasthani, Sanskrit, Bodo, Santali, Konkani as extremely low-resource) plus Sanskrit-English code-mixed set. We evaluated 20 LLMs, both proprietary and open-weights, which reveals that even the top-performing \texttt{Gemini-2.5} reaches 58\% average accuracy, followed by \texttt{GPT-5} (45) and \texttt{DeepSeek-3.2} (43.1). We additionally label each question as knowledge-oriented or purely linguistic to discriminate factual recall from grammatical proficiency. Further, we assess the ability of LLMs to handle diverse question formats-such as list-based matching, assertion-reason pairs, and sequence ordering-alongside conventional multiple-choice questions. \benchmark\ provides insights into limitations of cross-lingual transfer and establishes a challenging benchmark for Indic languages. The dataset is available at this https URL. Scripts to run benchmark are present at this https URL. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2512.00333 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2512.00333v2 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.00333 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Ayush Maheshwari Dr. [view email] [v1] Sat, 29 Nov 2025 05:49:50 UTC (1,442 KB) [v2] Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:16:09 UTC (1,464 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled IndicParam: Benchmark to evaluate LLMs on low-resource Indic Languages, by Ayush Maheshwari and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2025-12 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容