最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org · @Arlindo L. Oliveira

双过程语言 Agent 的认知扩展:交互环境中的记忆与自我反思

原文 我的收藏

针对语言 Agent 在交互环境中长程状态跟踪、动作执行与失败恢复脆弱的问题,论文在双过程 Agent SwiftSage(快速动作提议器加较慢规划器)上引入两个模块化扩展:自适应记忆模块 AMM 负责显著性门控的情景存储与触发式检索,自我反思模块 SRM 负责有界的执行期校验与纠正干预。两者以特性开关形式实现于同一执行底座,便于在 ScienceWorld 上做受控消融。四组配置对比中,完整系统取得最佳平均最终得分 64.62、成功率 43.17%、成功步效率 19.33 步,SRM 是单独贡献最强的模块,结果指向执行期控制是主要瓶颈。

AI推荐理由 论文在双过程 Agent SwiftSage 上增加自适应记忆模块(AMM)与自我反思模块(SRM),并在 ScienceWorld 上做四组消融,报告完整系统取得最佳平均最终得分 64.62、成功率 43.17%、成功步效率 19.33 步,SRM 为最强单模块贡献。实验设置与数值明确,对交互式 Agent 的执行期控制有直接参考价值;但仅在单一基准上验证,结论外推需谨慎。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.19128v1 (cs) [Submitted on 16 Sep 2026] Title:Cognitive Extensions for Dual-Process Language Agents: Memory and Self-Reflection in Interactive Environments Authors:João Meneses dos Santos, Arlindo L. Oliveira View a PDF of the paper titled Cognitive Extensions for Dual-Process Language Agents: Memory and Self-Reflection in Interactive Environments, by Jo\~ao Meneses dos Santos and Arlindo L. Oliveira View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Language agents remain brittle in interactive environments, where success requires long-horizon state tracking, valid action execution, and recovery from failed steps. We extend SwiftSage, a dual-process agent that combines a fast action proposer with a slower planner, using two modular cognitive extensions: an Adaptive Memory Module (AMM) for salience-gated episodic storage and trigger-driven retrieval, and a Self-Reflection Module (SRM) for bounded execution-time validation and corrective intervention. Both modules are implemented as feature-flagged extensions over the same execution substrate, enabling controlled ablations on ScienceWorld. Across four configurations---baseline, baseline+AMM, baseline+SRM, and the full system---the full system achieves the best mean final score (64.62), success rate (43.17%), and successful-step efficiency (19.33 steps), while SRM is the strongest standalone contributor. The results suggest that execution-time control is the dominant bottleneck in this setting, while episodic memory becomes most useful once the runtime loop is stabilized. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2609.19128 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19128v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19128 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Joao Miguel Meneses Dos Santos [view email] [v1] Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:50:42 UTC (260 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Cognitive Extensions for Dual-Process Language Agents: Memory and Self-Reflection in Interactive Environments, by Jo\~ao Meneses dos Santos and Arlindo L. Oliveira View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容