最新资讯
dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数 engadget.com Perplexity 推出“teammates”日常工作任务 AI agent computerworld.com 别提数据中心:OpenAI 改称“compute campuses” theguardian.com 俄美试图阻止就自主武器制定具有约束力的规则 bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

AVID:通过智能体驱动构建的全模态音视频不一致性理解基准

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 AVID,称其为首个面向视频音视频不一致性理解的大规模基准。构建流程包括将视频内容分为 Active Speaker、Voiceover、Scenic 的时序分段、由智能体驱动的策略规划器选择语义合适的不一致类别,以及五类专用注入器生成音视频冲突。数据集含 11.2K 段长视频(平均 235.5 秒)、39.4K 个标注不一致事件和 78.7K 个片段,覆盖检测、时序定位、分类与推理四类任务及 8 种细粒度不一致类别。对现有全模态模型的评测显示其在时序定位与推理上存在明显不足;作者微调的 AVID-Qwen 相比基座模型在片段推理上 BLEU-4 提升 2.8 倍,时序定位 mIoU 为 36.1%(对比 26.2%),整体理解 SODA-m 为 7.47(对比 6.15)。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.MM),摘要给出明确可核验信息:首个面向长视频音视频不一致性理解的大规模基准,含 11.2K 长视频(平均 235.5 秒)、39.4K 标注不一致事件、78.7K 片段,8 类细粒度不一致;构建流程含时序分段、agent 驱动的策略规划器和五类注入器。评测显示现有全模态模型在时序定位与推理上存在明显局限,微调基线 AVID-Qwen 在片段推理 BLEU-4 提升 2.8 倍、时序定位 mIoU 36.1% 对 26.2%、SODA-m 7.47 对 6.15。局限:为作者自述结果,尚无第三方复现;基准与注入式构造的生态效度需后续验证。

78

正文

Computer Science > Multimedia arXiv:2604.13593 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 15 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:AVID: A Benchmark for Omni-Modal Audio-Visual Inconsistency Understanding via Agent-Driven Construction Authors:Zixuan Chen, Depeng Wang, Hao Lin, Li Luo, Ke Xu, Ya Guo, Huijia Zhu, Tanfeng Sun, Xinghao Jiang View a PDF of the paper titled AVID: A Benchmark for Omni-Modal Audio-Visual Inconsistency Understanding via Agent-Driven Construction, by Zixuan Chen and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We present AVID, the first large-scale benchmark for audio-visual inconsistency understanding in videos. While omni-modal large language models excel at temporally aligned tasks such as captioning and question answering, they struggle to perceive cross-modal conflicts, a fundamental human capability that is critical for trustworthy AI. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on aligned events or deepfake detection, leaving a significant gap in evaluating inconsistency perception in long-form video contexts. AVID addresses this with: (1) a scalable construction pipeline comprising temporal segmentation that classifies video content into Active Speaker, Voiceover, and Scenic categories; an agent-driven strategy planner that selects semantically appropriate inconsistency categories; and five specialized injectors for diverse audio-visual conflict injection; (2) 11.2K long videos (avg. 235.5s) with 39.4K annotated inconsistency events and 78.7K segment clips, supporting evaluation across detection, temporal grounding, classification, and reasoning with 8 fine-grained inconsistency categories. Comprehensive evaluations of state-of-the-art omni-models reveal significant limitations in temporal grounding and reasoning. Our fine-tuned baseline, AVID-Qwen, achieves substantial improvements over the base model (2.8$\times$ higher BLEU-4 in segment reasoning) and surpasses all compared models in temporal grounding (mIoU: 36.1\% vs 26.2\%) and holistic understanding (SODA-m: 7.47 vs 6.15), validating AVID as an effective testbed for advancing trustworthy omni-modal AI systems. Subjects: Multimedia (cs.MM) Cite as: arXiv:2604.13593 [cs.MM] (or arXiv:2604.13593v2 [cs.MM] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13593 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Zixuan Chen [view email] [v1] Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:57:04 UTC (5,598 KB) [v2] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:20:12 UTC (5,598 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled AVID: A Benchmark for Omni-Modal Audio-Visual Inconsistency Understanding via Agent-Driven Construction, by Zixuan Chen and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.MM new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容