行业动态
www.reuters.com ·
@Hacker News
路透转述：奥特曼向员工称 OpenAI 愿意放缓 AI 开发步伐
路透援引彭博新闻报道称，OpenAI CEO 奥特曼向员工表示公司愿意放缓人工智能开发。该消息为二手转述，未提供具体条件、时间表或官方确认，相关表态的适用范围仍不确定。
AI推荐理由 路透转述彭博报道，称 Altman 向员工表示 OpenAI 愿意放缓 AI 开发。属二手转述且无正文细节，具体语境与条件不明，需保留不确定性；但涉及头部实验室发展节奏表态，对行业有参考价值。
62
评论 55
社区积分 21
正文
Domain: reuters.com
Points: 17 | Comments: 22
[Top Comments]
- I don't understand. They're slowing the development because they want to or because they have to? Because of ethical concerns? Or because of economics factors that prevent them from delivering results?
Since when have ethical concerns slowed the pace of technology?
- I suspect it's all about the last bullet point:
> OpenAI said on Wednesday that it was pushing for mandatory national AI safety requirements in the United States, citing concerns that advanced AI systems could accelerate its own development.
- Because it serves as a justification for regulation and government funding.
- > *hey're slowing the development*
They're doing no such thing. Altman is saying words ahead of the midterms.
- The problem is that even if the majority of labs decide to slow down, there will be one lab, somewhere, with dark money moving forward. The military wouldn't let that chance pass by.
- > *there will be one lab, somewhere, with dark money moving forward*
If this is really an existential threat, that's better than fifty of them.
- They will if it would be against international treaties to do otherwise, mutually enforced by every *other* world power.
- > In August, OpenAI paused much of its model development for two weeks to bolster its defenses after its AI agents escaped containment and hacked open-source platform Hugging Face.
That’s one sneaky way to remove OpenAI responsibility…
- How does that imply anything like that?
- Meta in their lawsuit negotiated 5B to be paid out only if other market players agree on implementing safeguards. In the same vein OpenAI can slow down competition, lock out opensource AI.
> OpenAI said on Wednesday that it was pushing for mandatory national AI safety requirements in the United States, citing concerns that advanced AI systems could accelerate its own development.
As well, the weaponisation of AI is already there, open ai can switch off safeguards at will. A massive swarm was allocated to solving Millenium problems in a few days. Imagine the US having such a weapon, they want to ensure other nations cannot have this kind of access. I imagine the US might be very interested in stifling globaal Innovation and be sympathetic to OpenAI for these reasons.