最新资讯
dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

SkillScope:面向智能体技能的细粒度最小权限强制执行

原文 我的收藏

该论文指出 Agent Skills 以元数据、自然语言指令和可执行资源打包扩展 LLM 智能体,但技能可能执行超出当前用户请求范围的高影响动作,违反最小权限原则;由于同一动作在不同提示下合法性不同,该问题本质上是任务条件化的,现有技能检测方法不足。作者提出 SkillScope:用图分析将指令级流程与代码级操作建模为细粒度动作节点,抽取潜在越权候选,在图实例化的用户任务下通过运行时分析验证,并用控制流权限约束限制已确认的越权动作。评估显示技能级越权检测 F1 为 94.53%;在真实环境中从 68,312 个有效 Skill 中验证 6,590 个存在越权行为;权限约束使任务中触发的越权动作实例减少 88.56%,同时保持合法任务完成。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.CR),提出针对 Agent Skills 的细粒度最小权限强制执行框架 SkillScope:以图结构建模指令级流程与代码级操作,抽取潜在越权候选,并在图实例化的用户任务下做运行时验证,再通过控制流权限约束限制越权行为。摘要给出可核验的量化结果:技能级越权检测 F1 达 94.53%,在 68,312 个真实 Skill 中验证 6,590 个存在越权行为,权限约束使任务中触发的越权动作实例减少 88.56% 且保持合法任务完成。新信息在于把“同一动作在不同用户提示下是否越权”这一任务条件化问题形式化并给出检测与约束方法,对 Agent 技能生态的安全与权限治理有直接参考价值。局限:摘要未说明数据集构成、误报代价与真实部署开销,效果数字来自作者自评实验,尚待复现。

82

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2605.05868 (cs) [Submitted on 7 May 2026 (v1), last revised 10 Sep 2026 (this version, v3)] Title:SkillScope: Toward Fine-Grained Least-Privilege Enforcement for Agent Skills Authors:Jiangrong Wu, Yuhong Nan, Yixi Lin, Huaijin Wang, Yuming Xiao, Shuai Wang, Zibin Zheng View a PDF of the paper titled SkillScope: Toward Fine-Grained Least-Privilege Enforcement for Agent Skills, by Jiangrong Wu and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Agent Skills have become a practical way to extend LLM agents by packaging metadata, natural-language instructions, and executable resources into reusable capability bundles. However, this growing Skill ecosystem introduces a new compliance risk: a Skill may perform high-impact actions that fall outside the scope permitted by the user's current request, thereby violating least privilege. Existing skill detection approaches are insufficient for this problem because it is inherently task-conditioned: the same action may be legitimate under one user prompt but over-privileged under another. In this paper, we present SkillScope, a framework for fine-grained least-privilege enforcement in Agent Skills. SkillScope adopts a graph-based analysis approach that models instruction-level procedures and code-level operations as fine-grained action nodes. It extracts potential over-privilege candidates, validates them under graph-instantiated user tasks through runtime analysis, and constrains validated over-privileged actions via control-flow privilege constraining. We evaluate SkillScope through effectiveness experiments and large-scale real-world measurement. SkillScope achieves a 94.53% skill-level F1 score for over-privilege detection. In the wild, SkillScope validates 6,590 of 68,312 valid real-world Skills as exhibiting over-privileged behaviors, showing that least-privilege violations are prevalent in current Skill ecosystems. In the privilege-constraining evaluation, SkillScope reduces triggered over-privileged action-in-task instances by 88.56% while preserving legitimate task completion. Comments: Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2605.05868 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2605.05868v3 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05868 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yixi Lin [view email] [v1] Thu, 7 May 2026 08:34:14 UTC (1,072 KB) [v2] Mon, 7 Sep 2026 13:49:06 UTC (1,100 KB) [v3] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:12:32 UTC (1,099 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SkillScope: Toward Fine-Grained Least-Privilege Enforcement for Agent Skills, by Jiangrong Wu and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容