最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

理解基于混淆的端侧LLM保护的安全边界

原文 我的收藏

论文针对 TEE 保护的端侧 LLM 中 TEE-Shielded LLM Partition(TSLP)方法多为启发式设计的问题,形式化了一组满足特定代数性质的线性计算混淆原语,证明代表性 TSLP 框架的矩阵级权重变换可表示为这些原语的组合,其规范形 O_prior 刻画了该原语族的结构边界。作者提出原语引导的 Collapse 攻击,指出 ArrowCloak(Security'25)、TSQP(S&P'25)、LoRO(NeurIPS'25)等方法存在共性漏洞,并引入两个新原语构成 O_ext 以扩展安全边界。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(2026-09-09 提交),形式化了一组混淆原语,用其组合的规范形 O_prior 刻画 TEE-Shielded LLM Partition 方法的结构性安全边界,并提出 Collapse 攻击,声称在 ArrowCloak(Security'25)、TSQP(S&P'25)、LoRO(NeurIPS'25)等已发表方法上存在共性漏洞,随后引入两个新原语构成 O_ext 扩展边界。对端侧 LLM 知识产权保护与 TEE 卸载方案有直接参考价值;但攻击效果的具体数据未在摘要中给出,需查阅全文验证。

74

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2609.10117 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Sep 2026] Title:Understanding the Security Boundary of Obfuscation-based On-Device LLM Protection Authors:Hanyi Zhou, Chenyang Li, Yuanzhe Pang, Ke Xu, Mingwei Xu, Zhuotao Liu View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding the Security Boundary of Obfuscation-based On-Device LLM Protection, by Hanyi Zhou and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) offer a promising mechanism for safeguarding the intellectual property of on-device Large Language Models (LLMs). To overcome the inherent computational bottlenecks of TEEs, existing TEE-Shielded LLM Partition (TSLP) methods apply efficient obfuscation schemes to computationally intensive layers, offloading them to external GPUs while retaining only lightweight operations within the TEE. Although a growing body of TSLP-based approaches has emerged, these defense mechanisms remain largely heuristic. Consequently, some methods are proven vulnerable to certain specialized adversarial attacks designed to exploit their specific architectural implementations. To overcome the limitations of these heuristic designs, this paper addresses a fundamental research question: can we establish common primitives to unify representative prior methodologies, characterize the security boundary of their compositions, and systematically extend them? To this end, we formalize a set of obfuscation primitives, defined as dual-tuples of linear computations satisfying specific algebraic properties. We demonstrate that the matrix-level weight transformations of the representative efficient TSLP frameworks studied in this paper can be expressed as compositions of these primitives; consequently, the canonical form of these primitive compositions, denoted as O_prior, characterizes the structural boundary of this primitive family. We then expose the vulnerabilities of O_prior through a novel primitive-guided attack methodology, Collapse, demonstrating a shared vulnerability in several prominent TSLP methods published in top-tier venues, such as ArrowCloak (Security'25), TSQP (S&P'25), and LoRO (NeurIPS'25). Finally, we introduce two novel obfuscation primitives and integrate them with existing constructs to formulate O_ext, extending this security boundary. Comments: Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2609.10117 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2609.10117v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10117 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Hanyi Zhou [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 12:51:55 UTC (1,746 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding the Security Boundary of Obfuscation-based On-Device LLM Protection, by Hanyi Zhou and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 理解基于混淆的端侧LLM保护的安全边界 09-10 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容