最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 www.aibase.com ·

加州签署多项 AI 安全法案,罕见获 OpenAI 与 Anthropic 同时背书

原文 我的收藏

加州州长 Gavin Newsom 正式签署一批 AI 监管法案,重点针对超大规模基础模型的安全风险评估、透明度披露和防范灾难性网络攻击。法案要求万亿参数级前沿系统在训练和部署前进行标准化红队演练、建立灾难风险缓解协议,并向州监管机构提交经第三方独立审计的合规安全报告;同时纳入 AI 生成内容的溯源标识与水印标准,并保护举报人。与早期引发硅谷强烈反对的激进监管提案不同,这批法案在起草修订中吸收了领先 AI 实验室的技术建议,最终更侧重建立透明的“风险前置评估框架”和行业最佳实践基准,而非设定硬性技术上限,因而获得 OpenAI、Anthropic 等机构的协作支持。

AI推荐理由 输入提供了加州签署多项 AI 安全法案的具体监管内容:万亿参数级前沿模型在训练和部署前须进行红队演练、建立灾难风险缓解协议并提交第三方独立审计的合规安全报告;AI 生成内容需加溯源水印,举报人受法律保护。同时提到 OpenAI 与 Anthropic 在立法辩论中背书,以及法案从硬性技术上限转向“风险前置评估框架”和行业最佳实践基准。局限在于来源为 AIbase 转述,未给出法案编号、具体条款文本或官方签署文件,背书细节无法独立核实,因此不能视为官方首发或已验证。

72

正文

California Enacts Multiple AI Safety Laws, Uncommonly Backed by OpenAI and Anthropic AIbase基地 Published inAI News · 5 min read · Sep 10, 2026 8 California Governor Gavin Newsom has officially signed a landmark set of artificial intelligence regulatory bills. Notably, this batch of new laws, aimed at strengthening the safety risk assessment of cutting-edge large models, transparency disclosure, and preventing catastrophic cyberattacks, received rare endorsements and public support from several leading Silicon Valley AI companies, including OpenAI and Anthropic, during previous legislative debates. Models with Trillion-Parameter Scale Must Undergo "Red Team Drills + Third-Party Audit" Before Launch In recent years, as the computational power of generative AI has expanded exponentially and the autonomous capabilities of cutting-edge foundational models have significantly improved, concerns about AI being misused for critical infrastructure destruction, automated biochemical weapon development, large-scale deepfake manipulation, and severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities have intensified. Due to continued stagnation in federal-level AI legislation in the U.S. Congress, the California State Legislature has taken on the role of a pioneer in AI legislation across the country. The multiple bills signed this time focus on legally regulating the safety testing standards for ultra-large-scale foundational models. They require model developers to conduct standardized red team confrontation drills, establish strict catastrophe risk mitigation protocols, and submit compliance security reports that have been independently audited by third parties to state regulatory agencies before training and deploying frontier systems with trillion-parameter scale. Different from previous radical regulatory proposals that caused intense turmoil in Silicon Valley and faced strong opposition from tech giants and venture capital institutions, this set of bills incorporated in-depth technical suggestions from leading AI laboratories during the drafting and revision process. Anthropic and OpenAI had previously expressed deep concerns about overly rigid provisions that could stifle the development of open-source communities or expand civil liability indefinitely. After intensive lobbying and minor adjustments to the clauses, the final enacted bills focus more on establishing transparent "pre-risk assessment frameworks" and "industry best practice benchmarks," rather than directly setting hard technical caps or implementing unworkable punitive measures, thus gaining collaborative support from major AI research institutions within the legal framework. Deepfakes Must Be Watermarked, Whistleblowers Are Legally Protected In addition to underlying safety reviews, the bill also includes traceability identification and watermarking standards for AI-generated content, requiring platforms and major content distribution channels to add system-level digital fingerprints to deepfake audio and video content to prevent the spread of false information in elections and malicious personal fraud. At the same time, the bill provides more explicit legal protection for internal employees and researchers who discover and expose potential major security vulnerabilities in models, strictly prohibiting companies from depriving technical personnel of their right to report catastrophic security risks to regulatory authorities through harsh confidentiality agreements. This move marks that California, as a core hub for global AI research and development, has explored a regulatory approach that is relatively recognized by the industry, balancing stringent security boundaries with maintaining industrial innovation vitality. AI TerminologyRed Team DrillsOpenAIAnthropic This article is from AIbase Daily Scan to view Welcome to the [AI Daily] column! This is your daily guide to exploring the world of artificial intelligence. Every day, we present you with hot topics in the AI field, focusing on developers, helping you understand technical trends, and learning about innovative AI product applications. —— Created by the AIbase Daily Team © Copyright AIbase Base 2024, Click to View Source -

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容