最新资讯
bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 analyticsindiamag.com 小语言模型可能重塑企业 AI 部署方式 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

EADC:大型语言模型高级深度合规性评估

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 EADC,一个面向 LLM 合规性的评估基准,针对现有静态基准的三点不足:规则不符合 AI 法律法规要求、仅覆盖显式合规风险、无法追踪风险沿逻辑依赖链的传播。方法上把抽象法律规则映射为结构化多关系知识图谱,由自动化 agent 合成高复杂度对抗场景,并由人类 AI 法律专家全程审核修正,最终形成 4,435+ QA 对的多维分类数据集,涵盖偏见与歧视、公平性、个人隐私保护和价值观。数据集引入上下文长程交互与逻辑驱动风险链,以捕捉绕过传统过滤器的深层合规异常。摘要称实验暴露了当前 SOTA 模型的监管盲点,但未披露具体模型与量化结果。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新提交论文(2026-09-22),提出 EADC 合规评估基准,基于 AI 合规知识图谱与法律专家构建 4,435+ QA 对,覆盖偏见歧视、公平性、隐私保护与价值观,并引入上下文长程交互与逻辑驱动风险链以捕捉隐式合规风险。新信息在于从静态基准转向图谱化、对抗场景合成与逻辑依赖链追踪;局限是摘要仅称实验暴露了 SOTA 模型的监管盲区,未给出具体模型、指标数值或可复现细节,实际效果仍需全文验证。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.26175 (cs) [Submitted on 22 Sep 2026] Title:EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models Authors:Yan Zhang, Ruien Li, Yaoyao Peng, Wanxin Ren, Yijia Zhang, Wusheng Zhang, Guangwen Yang View a PDF of the paper titled EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models, by Yan Zhang and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used in various industries. However, ensuring their compliance with complex laws and regulatory frameworks remains a great challenge. Existing evaluation paradigms mainly rely on static benchmarks that suffer from three severe limitations: First, the compliance rules being used do not comply with the requirements of Artificial Intelligence (AI) laws and regulations; Second, they only handle apparent, explicit compliance risks, leaving implicit and covert compliance risks undetected; Third, they fail to track the systematic propagation of risks along logical dependency chains or evaluate compliance within nuanced, context-based real-world scenarios. To bridge this critical gap, we introduce EADC, a novel advanced evaluation benchmark of LLMs based on an AI compliance knowledge graph and AI compliance legal experts. By mapping abstract legal rules into structured logical multi-relational graphs, our framework enables automated, evolving agents to distill and synthesize highly sophisticated adversarial scenarios. This compliance benchmark is reviewed and corrected by human AI legal experts throughout the whole process. The resulting dataset (4,435+ QA pairs) provides an extensive, multi-dimensional taxonomy covering critical regulatory frontiers, including bias and discrimination, fairness, personal privacy protection, and values. Crucially, our compliance dataset moves beyond shallow string-matching by incorporating contextual long-horizon interactions and logic-driven hazard chains, capturing deeply embedded compliance anomalies that bypass traditional filters. Experiment evaluations demonstrate that our framework exposes critical regulatory blind spots in state-of-the-art LLMs, offering a rigorous, AI laws and regulations-aligned benchmark to safeguard high-level and deep compliance in the application of LLMs. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.26175 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.26175v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26175 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yan Zhang [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:00:07 UTC (816 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models, by Yan Zhang and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM EADC:大型语言模型高级深度合规性评估 09-23 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容