智能体
arxiv.org ·
EADC:大型语言模型高级深度合规性评估
该论文提出 EADC,一个面向 LLM 合规性的评估基准,针对现有静态基准的三点不足:规则不符合 AI 法律法规要求、仅覆盖显式合规风险、无法追踪风险沿逻辑依赖链的传播。方法上把抽象法律规则映射为结构化多关系知识图谱,由自动化 agent 合成高复杂度对抗场景,并由人类 AI 法律专家全程审核修正,最终形成 4,435+ QA 对的多维分类数据集,涵盖偏见与歧视、公平性、个人隐私保护和价值观。数据集引入上下文长程交互与逻辑驱动风险链,以捕捉绕过传统过滤器的深层合规异常。摘要称实验暴露了当前 SOTA 模型的监管盲点,但未披露具体模型与量化结果。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 新提交论文(2026-09-22),提出 EADC 合规评估基准,基于 AI 合规知识图谱与法律专家构建 4,435+ QA 对,覆盖偏见歧视、公平性、隐私保护与价值观,并引入上下文长程交互与逻辑驱动风险链以捕捉隐式合规风险。新信息在于从静态基准转向图谱化、对抗场景合成与逻辑依赖链追踪;局限是摘要仅称实验暴露了 SOTA 模型的监管盲区,未给出具体模型、指标数值或可复现细节,实际效果仍需全文验证。
72
正文
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2609.26175 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]
Title:EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models
Authors:Yan Zhang, Ruien Li, Yaoyao Peng, Wanxin Ren, Yijia Zhang, Wusheng Zhang, Guangwen Yang
View a PDF of the paper titled EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models, by Yan Zhang and 6 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used in various industries. However, ensuring their compliance with complex laws and regulatory frameworks remains a great challenge. Existing evaluation paradigms mainly rely on static benchmarks that suffer from three severe limitations: First, the compliance rules being used do not comply with the requirements of Artificial Intelligence (AI) laws and regulations; Second, they only handle apparent, explicit compliance risks, leaving implicit and covert compliance risks undetected; Third, they fail to track the systematic propagation of risks along logical dependency chains or evaluate compliance within nuanced, context-based real-world scenarios. To bridge this critical gap, we introduce EADC, a novel advanced evaluation benchmark of LLMs based on an AI compliance knowledge graph and AI compliance legal experts. By mapping abstract legal rules into structured logical multi-relational graphs, our framework enables automated, evolving agents to distill and synthesize highly sophisticated adversarial scenarios. This compliance benchmark is reviewed and corrected by human AI legal experts throughout the whole process. The resulting dataset (4,435+ QA pairs) provides an extensive, multi-dimensional taxonomy covering critical regulatory frontiers, including bias and discrimination, fairness, personal privacy protection, and values. Crucially, our compliance dataset moves beyond shallow string-matching by incorporating contextual long-horizon interactions and logic-driven hazard chains, capturing deeply embedded compliance anomalies that bypass traditional filters. Experiment evaluations demonstrate that our framework exposes critical regulatory blind spots in state-of-the-art LLMs, offering a rigorous, AI laws and regulations-aligned benchmark to safeguard high-level and deep compliance in the application of LLMs.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.26175 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2609.26175v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26175
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Yan Zhang [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:00:07 UTC (816 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models, by Yan Zhang and 6 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)