最新资讯
bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 analyticsindiamag.com 小语言模型可能重塑企业 AI 部署方式 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 arxiv.org ·

为你量身定制:语言模型个性化的纵向效应

原文 我的收藏

研究招募 992 名参与者,进行为期 5 天的每日建议咨询交互,对比非个性化基线、基于记忆的个性化和基于问卷的个性化三种条件。结果显示,人机交互随时间的多项变化主要由重复暴露而非个性化驱动;但个性化组在建议寻求和信息分享态度上存在差异:记忆组自我披露更多、认为模型更不诡异,问卷组对分享个人信息后悔程度更高。作者据此讨论个性化 AI 系统负责任设计与部署的启示。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者来自 DeepMind 等机构(摘要未标注,仅凭作者名单不可断言官方身份),研究设计明确:992 名参与者、5 天纵向实验,对比非个性化、基于记忆和基于问卷三种个性化方式。新信息在于发现人机交互随时间的变化主要由重复暴露驱动而非个性化本身,且不同个性化方式带来差异化后果(记忆组自我披露更多、认为模型更不诡异;问卷组对分享个人信息更后悔)。局限是仅 5 天、单一任务场景,结论为初步证据,尚未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.20077 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Sep 2026] Title:Tailored to you: longitudinal effects of personalising language models Authors:Canfer Akbulut, Justine Breuch, Arianna Manzini, Lujain Ibrahim, Matija Franklin, Roma Patel, Iason Gabriel, Kristian Lum, Laura Weidinger View a PDF of the paper titled Tailored to you: longitudinal effects of personalising language models, by Canfer Akbulut and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Interest in developing personalised language models is rapidly growing. While personalisation is often viewed as a mechanism to better serve diverse user needs, the effects of sustained interactions with personalised models on people's perception of and behaviour toward AI remain poorly understood. Most critically, downstream consequences outside the immediate human--AI interaction loop, such as effects on users' self-perceptions and interpersonal relationships, remain largely unexamined. In this study, we recruited 992 participants to complete daily advice-seeking interactions with language models over the course of five days, comparing outcomes from a non-personalised baseline against two personalisation approaches: memory-based (conditioned on prior conversational history) and survey-based (conditioned on information collected through a pre-study intake survey). We find that several changes in human-AI interaction over time are driven primarily by repeated exposure rather than personalisation itself. However, participants interacting with personalised models experienced differences in advice-seeking and information-sharing attitudes and behaviours: participants in the memory-based condition engaged in greater self-disclosure and rated the model as less creepy, while participants in the survey-based condition reported higher regret about having shared personal information with the AI. We conclude by highlighting the nuanced effects of different personalisation approaches on interaction outcomes, and discussing the implications of these findings for the responsible design and deployment of personalised AI systems. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.20077 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.20077v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20077 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Canfer Akbulut [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:35:06 UTC (2,885 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Tailored to you: longitudinal effects of personalising language models, by Canfer Akbulut and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 为你量身定制:语言模型个性化的纵向效应 09-18 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容