最新资讯
bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 analyticsindiamag.com 小语言模型可能重塑企业 AI 部署方式 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

MaSCoD:结构上下文引导的候选因果图生成多智能体框架

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 MaSCoD 多智能体框架,在直接边判断之前先组织候选第三变量与局部结构模式,以控制候选因果图中相关关系的过早遗漏。在 Auto-MPG、DWD、Sachs 上以 GPT-5.4 为主骨干、GPT-4o 复现,结果显示 Full 阶段在全部六种数据集-骨干组合下平均 Recall 与 F1 高于 No Phase 1,但假阳性率也上升;参考边保留优势仅在 DWD+GPT-5.4 与 Sachs+GPT-4o 出现,并非普遍成立。作者据此主张将结构预组织作为遗漏控制的显式设计与评估目标。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者与摘要明确,实验覆盖 Auto-MPG、DWD、Sachs 三个数据集及 GPT-5.4/GPT-4o 两种骨干,并给出消融与分阶段分析,信息密度高。其新意在于把“候选因果图生成中过早遗漏相关因果关系”作为显式设计与评估目标,用多智能体先组织候选第三变量与局部结构模式再做直接边判断。局限是结论为数据集与骨干依赖的保留-选择性权衡,并非普遍更优,且尚未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.19944 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Sep 2026] Title:MaSCoD: A Multi-Agent Framework for Structural-Context-Guided Candidate Causal Graph Generation Authors:Yudai Nakada, Yuichiro Nishiura, Jin Michael Splichal View a PDF of the paper titled MaSCoD: A Multi-Agent Framework for Structural-Context-Guided Candidate Causal Graph Generation, by Yudai Nakada and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have been applied to causal discovery, but candidate-graph generation rarely treats premature omission of potentially relevant causal relations as an explicit design objective. We propose MaSCoD, a multi-agent framework that organizes candidate third variables and local structural patterns before direct-edge judgment. We evaluate MaSCoD on Auto-MPG, DWD, and Sachs using GPT-5.4 as the primary backbone and GPT-4o for replication. MaSCoD exhibits a dataset- and backbone-dependent retention-selectivity profile rather than uniform superiority. Across all six dataset-backbone settings, Full, which supplies structural hypotheses before direct-edge judgment, achieved higher mean Recall and F1 than No Phase 1, which instead constructs them within the judgment procedure, while also increasing false-positive rates. Additional reference-edge retention over all evaluated baselines was observed on DWD with GPT-5.4 and on Sachs with GPT-4o, rather than uniformly across settings. Partial ablations showed that supplying both information components did not always outperform supplying only one. For GPT-5.4, stage-wise analysis showed that the Full-No Phase 1 retention gap was already present after direct-edge judgment, while reconciliation introduced additional reference-edge loss for Full on Sachs. These findings support structural pre-organization as an explicit design and evaluation target for omission control and motivate evaluating context construction jointly with its utilization in judgment. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.19944 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19944v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19944 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yuichiro Nishiura [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 09:17:15 UTC (251 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MaSCoD: A Multi-Agent Framework for Structural-Context-Guided Candidate Causal Graph Generation, by Yudai Nakada and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容