最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

行为还不够:基于机制的大语言模型社会中社会规范涌现评估

原文 我的收藏

该论文指出仅凭行为收敛无法判定社会规范涌现,因为相同的合作均衡可能来自共同期望、策略激励或单纯模仿。作者提出评估框架,在行为收敛之外测量智能体的经验性与规范性期望,并通过受控消融分离社会学习(互动)与社会选择(网络分组)两种机制,在四个 LLM 家族下检验对抗扰动后的稳定性。结果显示:引出期望会提高合作贡献,社会学习稳定行为,社会选择能可靠识别合作者但行为强化有限;扰动后规范性期望与行为协调的恢复方式不同。该框架使各机制贡献可被分别归因,为多智能体系统设计者选择维持合作的社会过程提供依据。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 多智能体系统方向新论文,提出基于机制的评估框架:除行为收敛外,还测量智能体的经验性与规范性期望,并通过受控消融分离社会学习(互动)与社会选择(网络分组)两种机制,在四个 LLM 家族下测试对抗扰动后的稳定性。结论指出期望引出会提升合作贡献、社会学习稳定行为、社会选择能识别合作者但行为强化有限,且扰动后规范性期望与行为协调的恢复路径不同。局限是仅基于摘要,未见实验规模、模型版本与量化指标,结论为受控实验条件下的初步发现。

72

正文

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems arXiv:2609.26481 (cs) [Submitted on 22 Sep 2026] Title:Behavior is Not Enough: A Mechanism-Based Evaluation of Social Norm Emergence in LLM Societies Authors:Rasika Muralidharan, Haewoon Kwak, Jisun An View a PDF of the paper titled Behavior is Not Enough: A Mechanism-Based Evaluation of Social Norm Emergence in LLM Societies, by Rasika Muralidharan and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Social norms cannot be identified from behavior alone: the same cooperative equilibrium may reflect shared expectations, strategic incentives, or simple imitation. Yet in multi-agent large language model systems, prior work largely treats behavioral convergence as evidence of norm emergence. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework that measures agents' reported empirical and normative expectations in addition to behavioral convergence. Through controlled ablations, we test the effect of expectation elicitation and isolate two collective mechanisms central to theories of norm formation---social learning through interaction and social selection through network-based group formation. We further test the stability of these resulting dynamics under adversarial disruption across four LLM families. We find that eliciting expectations increases cooperative contributions, while social learning stabilizes behavior, and social selection reliably identifies cooperators but provides limited behavioral reinforcement. Following disruption, normative expectations and behavioral coordination recover differently. Together, these results show that similar cooperative outcomes can arise from different underlying social processes. By making expectations observable, our framework allows us to attribute each mechanism's contribution separately, offering designers of multi-agent systems a principled basis for selecting the social processes that sustain cooperation. Comments: Subjects: Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.26481 [cs.MA] (or arXiv:2609.26481v1 [cs.MA] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26481 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Rasika Muralidharan [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:21:04 UTC (1,289 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Behavior is Not Enough: A Mechanism-Based Evaluation of Social Norm Emergence in LLM Societies, by Rasika Muralidharan and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.MA new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.CY cs.GT cs.SI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容