大模型
arxiv.org ·
自然语言推理的语义抽象:发现并补偿大语言模型语义知识与推理缺口的方法论框架
该论文提出一个面向自然语言推理(NLI)的语义抽象方法论框架,以“语义兼容/不兼容”概念重构前提与假设之间的词汇-语义关系,从而构建更高抽象层次的语义网络并诱导不同推理路径。作者称该方法可发现并补偿 LLM 的语义知识缺口,在部分模型上准确率提升超过 10%,非蕴含类提升尤为明显,并主张弥合推理缺口需要结构化知识而非更多数据。论文发表于 Knowledge-Based Systems,摘要未披露具体数据集、基线与模型规模。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.CL),有明确作者、摘要与期刊引用(Knowledge-Based Systems),事实表述具体:提出面向 NLI 的语义抽象方法论框架,通过重构前提与假设间的词汇-语义关系诱导推理路径,报告部分模型准确率提升超过 10%,尤其非蕴含类。局限在于仅提供摘要,未给出数据集、基线、模型清单与实验细节,10% 提升无法独立核验;属方法论探索,对通用 Agent 与产业落地的直接价值有限。
62
正文
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.26610 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]
Title:Semantic Abstraction for Natural Language Inference: a Methodological Framework for Discovering and Compensating Semantic Knowledge and Reasoning Gaps in Large Language Models
Authors:David Torres-Moreno, Jorge Hermosillo-Valadez
View a PDF of the paper titled Semantic Abstraction for Natural Language Inference: a Methodological Framework for Discovering and Compensating Semantic Knowledge and Reasoning Gaps in Large Language Models, by David Torres-Moreno and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Despite their outstanding performance on many NLP tasks, LLMs face serious challenges related to semantic abstraction. In this study, we are interested in understanding how LLMs leverage abstract semantic knowledge in natural language inference (NLI), which requires sophisticated linguistic capabilities to interpret implicit meanings, contextual conceptual relationships, and semantic connections between words and phrases. To this end, we propose a methodological framework for constructing new semantic knowledge at a higher level of abstraction, which we define under the notions of semantic compatibility and incompatibility for NLI. In this framework, the meaning of the lexical-semantic relations between the premise and the hypothesis is reconfigured to achieve a more flexible semantic network that induces different reasoning paths in LLMs. These new pathways show a consistent pattern of responses that allows agreement on a single response. The results demonstrate that our proposal allows to discover and compensate for LLMs' semantic knowledge gaps in NLI, achieving significant improvements in accuracy, exceeding 10% for some models, and in particular for the non-entailment class. It is essential to note that LLMs need structured knowledge and not just more data to bridge reasoning gaps. Our hybrid approach directs attention to overlooked word relationships, allowing models to synthesize missing information. We believe that the future lies not in increasing model size, but in creating a semantic scafolding that mimics the flexibility of human thinking. Hopefully, our proposal will enable the development of more robust agents and interpretable reasoning, guiding AI toward reliable language understanding.
Comments:
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.26610 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.26610v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26610
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Journal reference:
Knowledge-Based Systems, 2026, 114825
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114825
Focus to learn more
DOI(s) linking to related resources
Submission history
From: David Torres [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:46:23 UTC (1,794 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Semantic Abstraction for Natural Language Inference: a Methodological Framework for Discovering and Compensating Semantic Knowledge and Reasoning Gaps in Large Language Models, by David Torres-Moreno and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)