最新资讯
www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

推理拓扑很重要:基于LLM的网络安全分析的受控研究

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 Security Reasoning Topology,将 LLM 推理过程建模为 Linear、Branching、Graph 三种结构,并在 MITRE ATT&CK 网络流量、CTI 威胁情报和 CVE 漏洞分析三个数据集上做受控实验,覆盖 Llama 2(7B/13B/70B)、GPT-5.1 和 Mistral Large 3。结果显示推理拓扑显著影响性能:Graph 推理整体准确率最高,较 few-shot prompting 提升 9.8-12.2 个百分点,Branching 为折中方案,且该效应在不同模型家族和规模上保持一致。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者与摘要信息完整,实验设计明确(三个网络安全数据集、多种 LLM、控制推理结构),报告 Graph 推理较 few-shot 提升 9.8-12.2 个百分点,属于可验证的受控研究;但为预印本、未经同行评审,且未提供代码或复现细节,结论需谨慎看待。对 LLM 推理结构设计与安全分析应用有参考价值。

78

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2609.24710 (cs) [Submitted on 21 Sep 2026] Title:Reasoning Topology Matters: A Controlled Study of LLM-Based Cybersecurity Analysis Authors:Jiling Zhou, Aisvarya Adeseye, Antti Hakkala, Seppo Virtanen, Jouni Isoaho View a PDF of the paper titled Reasoning Topology Matters: A Controlled Study of LLM-Based Cybersecurity Analysis, by Jiling Zhou and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in cybersecurity, where accurate analysis often requires multi-step and context-dependent reasoning over complex and heterogeneous data. However, existing prompting approaches typically focus on eliciting reasoning without explicitly considering how intermediate reasoning steps are structurally organized. We introduce Security Reasoning Topology, which models reasoning through three representative structures: Linear, Branching, and Graph. To evaluate their effects, we conduct controlled experiments on three cybersecurity datasets covering MITRE ATT&CK network traffic, cyber threat intelligence (CTI), and CVE vulnerability analysis. We evaluate multiple LLMs, including Llama 2 (7B, 13B, 70B), GPT-5.1, and Mistral Large 3, while keeping task inputs consistent and controlling reasoning structure through system-level prompting. Results show that reasoning topology substantially affects performance: Graph reasoning achieves the highest overall accuracy, improving over few-shot prompting by 9.8-12.2 percentage points across datasets, while Branching provides a strong intermediate solution. The results further show that the effect of reasoning topology remains consistent across model families and scales, highlighting reasoning topology as an important design factor for LLM-based cybersecurity analysis. Comments: Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.24710 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2609.24710v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24710 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jiling Zhou [view email] [v1] Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:52:30 UTC (693 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Reasoning Topology Matters: A Controlled Study of LLM-Based Cybersecurity Analysis, by Jiling Zhou and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容