最新资讯
bloomberg.com 台积电据报考虑生产先进 AI 存储芯片 www.infoq.com Yelp 为 AI Assistant 融合原生与服务器驱动 UI computerworld.com 英国监管机构:企业须为自家 AI 代理的错误负责 siliconangle.com Atomicwork 推出面向企业 IT 与安全的认证 AI 同事市场 computerworld.com OpenAI 收购小型软件公司以改进 Codex bdtechtalks.com Next-Concept Modeling 如何重新思考 AI 文本生成 computerworld.com Box 发布 Architect:用自然语言构建业务流程工作流 techrepublic.com Perplexity 推出 Teammates:每月 200 美元的 AI Agent 如何工作 the-decoder.com METR 称 Anthropic 或已在 7 月越过自身 AI 加速预警阈值 towardsdatascience.com 用 Ollama 和 Python 构建你的第一个多工具 AI Agent the-decoder.com Thinking Machines 的 Inkling 2 Small 称霸西方开放权重模型 dev.to 为 CI/CD 构建 AI 质量门禁
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

当 AI 进入职场,谁面临更大风险?一项性别化分析

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文研究 AI 驱动创新在不同性别主导职业中的暴露差异。作者构建将职业特征与 AI 暴露度指标关联的新数据集,分析 LLM 及更广泛 AI 技术在劳动力市场中的分布。结果显示,男性主导职业的 AI 暴露多集中于高技能高薪岗位,而女性主导职业的暴露在高技能高薪与低技能低薪岗位间相对均匀;LLM 相关暴露在女性主导职业中更高,广义 AI 创新暴露则更集中于男性主导职业。作者结合既有文献推测,处于低技能低薪女性主导职业的群体可能面临更高的任务自动化、岗位重组、工资下降和职业发展受限风险。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者与摘要信息完整,方法为将职业特征与 AI 暴露度指标关联的新数据集分析,结论明确区分 LLM 暴露与广义 AI 暴露在男性主导和女性主导职业中的分布差异,并指出低技能低薪女性主导职业可能面临更高自动化风险。局限在于仅基于摘要,未提供数据集规模、暴露度度量细节和因果证据,结论为相关性分析且需与既有文献三角验证,不能视为已证实的职场影响。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computers and Society arXiv:2609.21756 (cs) [Submitted on 18 Sep 2026] Title:When AI Enters the Workplace, Who Faces Greater Risks? A Gendered Analysis Authors:Miriam Fernandez, Ángel Pavón Pérez, Damiano Giallongo, Davide Ghia, Maryam Yaqub, Daniele Quercia, Tania Cerquitelli View a PDF of the paper titled When AI Enters the Workplace, Who Faces Greater Risks? A Gendered Analysis, by Miriam Fernandez and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Gender inequality remains a persistent structural feature of the labour market, shaping women's lifetime earnings and economic security. As artificial intelligence (AI) transforms organisational practices, there is growing concern that existing disparities may be unintentionally amplified through task automation, unequal access to upskilling opportunities, and differential returns obtained from technological change. In this paper, we examine how exposure to AI-driven innovation varies across male- and female-dominated occupations, with particular attention to differences across the skill and wage distribution. Using a novel dataset that links occupational characteristics to measures of AI exposure, we analyse how recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and broader AI technologies are distributed across the labour market. Our findings show that, while AI exposure is generally concentrated in higher-skilled and higher-paid occupations for male-dominated occupations, female-dominated occupations display relatively uniform levels of exposure across both high-skilled, high-paid, and low-skilled, low-paid occupations. Moreover, we find that LLM-related exposure is higher in female-dominated occupations, while exposure to broader AI innovation remains more concentrated in male-dominated occupations. A triangulation of these results with existing literature suggests that women, particularly those in the most vulnerable positions (lower-skilled and lower-paid female-dominated occupations), may face greater exposure to forms of AI associated with task automation, job restructuring, reduction of wages and limited career progression. Comments: Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2609.21756 [cs.CY] (or arXiv:2609.21756v1 [cs.CY] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21756 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Damiano Giallongo [view email] [v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:27:50 UTC (2,923 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled When AI Enters the Workplace, Who Faces Greater Risks? A Gendered Analysis, by Miriam Fernandez and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CY new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容