最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

更安全LLM时代的Hatebench:可复现性研究

原文 我的收藏

该研究独立复现了HateBench基准,使用现代LLM重建数据集生成流程,并评估了最新模型和检测器。结果发现,较新的LLM已具备防止有害内容生成的安全措施,且omni-Moderation对对抗性仇恨攻击的鲁棒性略有提升,但原始研究中的弱点部分仍存在。

AI推荐理由 该论文是对HateBench基准的可复现性研究,评估了现有仇恨言论检测器对LLM生成内容的泛化能力,并发现新LLM的安全防护已能阻止有害内容生成,且omni-Moderation的鲁棒性略有提升。信息密度高,来源为arXiv预印本,但尚未经同行评审,且结论部分基于复现,需注意其局限性。

72

正文

计算机科学 > 新兴技术 arXiv:2609.05169 (cs) [提交于2026年9月4日] 标题:更安全的LLM时代中的Hatebench 作者:Ole Becker, Tobias Jongen, Philip Kolbe, Sonal Khosla, Vaibhav Bajpai 查看论文标题为“更安全的LLM时代中的Hatebench”的PDF,作者为Ole Becker及其他3位作者 查看PDF HTML(实验性) 摘要:随着大型语言模型(LLM)降低了自动内容生成的门槛,产生仇恨言论的潜力对数字安全构成了重大挑战。本文对Shen等人提出的HateBench论文进行了可重复性研究,调查了现有的仇恨言论检测器(通常基于人类撰写的数据训练)是否能泛化到LLM生成的仇恨内容,并评估其报告的弱点是否随时间稳定且对不断演变的组件具有鲁棒性。我们使用现代LLM独立重建了原始数据集生成流程,并将基准扩展到包括最近发布的模型和更新的检测器版本。我们在当前条件下的独立评估发现,对于较新的LLM,已经设置了保障措施以防止有害内容的生成。我们还复制了两种复杂类型的仇恨运动的结果。虽然原始发现似乎因数据集中的偏差而被略微高估,但总体发现可以得到确认。最后,我们将文本审核与更新的全模态审核进行比较,发现其对对抗性仇恨运动的鲁棒性略有提高。通过澄清哪些检测器漏洞仍然存在,本研究向社区传达了内容审核测量的持久性。 主题: 新兴技术(cs.ET) 引用为: arXiv:2609.05169 [cs.ET] (或 arXiv:2609.05169v1 [cs.ET] 用于此版本) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05169 聚焦以了解更多 arXiv发布的DOI通过DataCite(待注册) 提交历史 来自:Sonal Khosla博士 [查看电子邮件] [v1] 2026年9月4日星期五 14:11:21 UTC(228 KB) 全文链接: 访问论文: 查看论文标题为“更安全的LLM时代中的Hatebench”的PDF,作者为Ole Becker及其他3位作者 查看PDF HTML(实验性) TeX源 查看许可证 当前浏览上下文: cs.ET 新 | 最近 | 2026-09 更改为浏览: cs 参考文献与引用 NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar 导出BibTeX引用 加载中... BibTeX格式引用 × 加载中... 数据由以下提供: 书签 书目工具 书目与引用工具 书目浏览器切换 书目浏览器(什么是书目浏览器?) 关联论文切换 关联论文(什么是关联论文?) Litmaps切换 Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?) scite.ai切换 scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?) 代码、数据、媒体 与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体 alphaXiv切换 alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?) 代码链接切换 CatalyzeX论文代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?) DagsHub切换 DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?) GotitPub切换 Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?) Huggingface切换 Hugging Face(什么是Huggingface?) ScienceCast切换 ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?) 演示 演示 Replicate切换 Replicate(什么是Replicate?) Spaces切换 Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?) Spaces切换 TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?) 相关论文 推荐与搜索工具 链接到Influence Flower Influence Flower(什么是Influence Flowers?) 核心推荐器切换 CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?) 作者 会议地点 机构 主题 关于arXivLabs arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目 arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。 与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都接受并认可我们的开放性、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私价值观。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。 有一个能为arXiv社区增加价值的项目想法吗?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。 这篇论文的哪些作者是背书人? | 禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Emerging Technologies arXiv:2609.05169 (cs) [Submitted on 4 Sep 2026] Title:Hatebench in the era of safer LLMs Authors:Ole Becker, Tobias Jongen, Philip Kolbe, Sonal Khosla, Vaibhav Bajpai View a PDF of the paper titled Hatebench in the era of safer LLMs, by Ole Becker and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:As Large Language Models (LLMs) lower the barrier for au- tomated content generation, the potential for producing hate speech poses a significant challenge for digital safety. This paper presents a reproducibility study of the HateBench paper by Shen et al., investigating whether existing hate speech detectors, typically trained on human-authored data, generalize to LLM-generated hateful content, and evaluating whether their reported weaknesses are stable over time and robust to evolving components. We independently reconstruct the original dataset genera- tion pipeline using modern LLMs and extend the benchmark to include recently released models and updated detector versions. Our independent assessment under current con- ditions finds that for newer LLMs, safeguards have been put into place to prevent the generation of harmful content. We also replicate the results for two sophisticated types of hate campaigns. While the original findings seem to have been overestimated slightly due to bias in the datasets, the overall findings can be confirmed. Finally, we compare text- Moderation against the newer omni-Moderation and find that its robustness against adversarial hate campaigns has improved slightly. By clarifying which detector vulnerabil- ities persist, this study informs the community about the longevity of content moderation measurements. Subjects: Emerging Technologies (cs.ET) Cite as: arXiv:2609.05169 [cs.ET] (or arXiv:2609.05169v1 [cs.ET] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05169 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Sonal Khosla Dr [view email] [v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:11:21 UTC (228 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Hatebench in the era of safer LLMs, by Ole Becker and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.ET new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 更安全LLM时代的Hatebench:可复现性研究 09-07 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容