大模型
arxiv.org ·
更安全LLM时代的Hatebench:可复现性研究
该研究独立复现了HateBench基准,使用现代LLM重建数据集生成流程,并评估了最新模型和检测器。结果发现,较新的LLM已具备防止有害内容生成的安全措施,且omni-Moderation对对抗性仇恨攻击的鲁棒性略有提升,但原始研究中的弱点部分仍存在。
AI推荐理由 该论文是对HateBench基准的可复现性研究,评估了现有仇恨言论检测器对LLM生成内容的泛化能力,并发现新LLM的安全防护已能阻止有害内容生成,且omni-Moderation的鲁棒性略有提升。信息密度高,来源为arXiv预印本,但尚未经同行评审,且结论部分基于复现,需注意其局限性。
72
正文
计算机科学 > 新兴技术
arXiv:2609.05169 (cs)
[提交于2026年9月4日]
标题:更安全的LLM时代中的Hatebench
作者:Ole Becker, Tobias Jongen, Philip Kolbe, Sonal Khosla, Vaibhav Bajpai
查看论文标题为“更安全的LLM时代中的Hatebench”的PDF,作者为Ole Becker及其他3位作者
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
摘要:随着大型语言模型(LLM)降低了自动内容生成的门槛,产生仇恨言论的潜力对数字安全构成了重大挑战。本文对Shen等人提出的HateBench论文进行了可重复性研究,调查了现有的仇恨言论检测器(通常基于人类撰写的数据训练)是否能泛化到LLM生成的仇恨内容,并评估其报告的弱点是否随时间稳定且对不断演变的组件具有鲁棒性。我们使用现代LLM独立重建了原始数据集生成流程,并将基准扩展到包括最近发布的模型和更新的检测器版本。我们在当前条件下的独立评估发现,对于较新的LLM,已经设置了保障措施以防止有害内容的生成。我们还复制了两种复杂类型的仇恨运动的结果。虽然原始发现似乎因数据集中的偏差而被略微高估,但总体发现可以得到确认。最后,我们将文本审核与更新的全模态审核进行比较,发现其对对抗性仇恨运动的鲁棒性略有提高。通过澄清哪些检测器漏洞仍然存在,本研究向社区传达了内容审核测量的持久性。
主题:
新兴技术(cs.ET)
引用为:
arXiv:2609.05169 [cs.ET]
(或
arXiv:2609.05169v1 [cs.ET] 用于此版本)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05169
聚焦以了解更多
arXiv发布的DOI通过DataCite(待注册)
提交历史
来自:Sonal Khosla博士 [查看电子邮件]
[v1]
2026年9月4日星期五 14:11:21 UTC(228 KB)
全文链接:
访问论文:
查看论文标题为“更安全的LLM时代中的Hatebench”的PDF,作者为Ole Becker及其他3位作者
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
TeX源
查看许可证
当前浏览上下文:
cs.ET
新
|
最近
| 2026-09
更改为浏览:
cs
参考文献与引用
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
导出BibTeX引用
加载中...
BibTeX格式引用
×
加载中...
数据由以下提供:
书签
书目工具
书目与引用工具
书目浏览器切换
书目浏览器(什么是书目浏览器?)
关联论文切换
关联论文(什么是关联论文?)
Litmaps切换
Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?)
scite.ai切换
scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?)
代码、数据、媒体
与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体
alphaXiv切换
alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?)
代码链接切换
CatalyzeX论文代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub切换
DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?)
GotitPub切换
Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?)
Huggingface切换
Hugging Face(什么是Huggingface?)
ScienceCast切换
ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?)
演示
演示
Replicate切换
Replicate(什么是Replicate?)
Spaces切换
Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?)
Spaces切换
TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?)
相关论文
推荐与搜索工具
链接到Influence Flower
Influence Flower(什么是Influence Flowers?)
核心推荐器切换
CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?)
作者
会议地点
机构
主题
关于arXivLabs
arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目
arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。
与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都接受并认可我们的开放性、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私价值观。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。
有一个能为arXiv社区增加价值的项目想法吗?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。
这篇论文的哪些作者是背书人? |
禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Emerging Technologies
arXiv:2609.05169 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026]
Title:Hatebench in the era of safer LLMs
Authors:Ole Becker, Tobias Jongen, Philip Kolbe, Sonal Khosla, Vaibhav Bajpai
View a PDF of the paper titled Hatebench in the era of safer LLMs, by Ole Becker and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:As Large Language Models (LLMs) lower the barrier for au- tomated content generation, the potential for producing hate speech poses a significant challenge for digital safety. This paper presents a reproducibility study of the HateBench paper by Shen et al., investigating whether existing hate speech detectors, typically trained on human-authored data, generalize to LLM-generated hateful content, and evaluating whether their reported weaknesses are stable over time and robust to evolving components. We independently reconstruct the original dataset genera- tion pipeline using modern LLMs and extend the benchmark to include recently released models and updated detector versions. Our independent assessment under current con- ditions finds that for newer LLMs, safeguards have been put into place to prevent the generation of harmful content. We also replicate the results for two sophisticated types of hate campaigns. While the original findings seem to have been overestimated slightly due to bias in the datasets, the overall findings can be confirmed. Finally, we compare text- Moderation against the newer omni-Moderation and find that its robustness against adversarial hate campaigns has improved slightly. By clarifying which detector vulnerabil- ities persist, this study informs the community about the longevity of content moderation measurements.
Subjects:
Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.05169 [cs.ET]
(or
arXiv:2609.05169v1 [cs.ET] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05169
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Sonal Khosla Dr [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:11:21 UTC (228 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Hatebench in the era of safer LLMs, by Ole Becker and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.ET
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)