最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

PIA-Bench:迈向基于大语言模型的自动化隐私影响评估

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 PIA-Bench,称其为首个评估 LLM 在真实隐私影响评估(PIA)任务上表现的开放基准。作者审计了美国联邦机构发布的 499 份专家撰写的 PIA,整理出 73 份结构化 PIA,包含 451 条隐私风险和 831 条缓解措施,用于测试 LLM 评估复杂系统隐私风险并提出缓解措施的能力。结果显示现成 LLM 能产出有意义的评估,但论文未披露具体准确率,作者呼吁改进面向 LLM Agent 的领域工作流、建设可问责的 LLM 基础设施并制定新的 PIA 质量标准。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新论文,提出首个面向真实隐私影响评估(PIA)的开放基准 PIA-Bench:审计了美国联邦机构发布的 499 份专家撰写的 PIA,整理出 73 份结构化 PIA,含 451 条隐私风险和 831 条缓解措施,用于评测 LLM 评估隐私风险与提出缓解措施的能力。摘要称现成 LLM 能给出有意义的评估,但未给出具体准确率数字,也未证明可实际替代人工 PIA;作者呼吁改进面向 LLM Agent 的领域工作流与可问责基础设施。价值在于为 LLM 在合规/隐私场景的评测提供了可复用的数据集与任务定义,局限是结论仍停留在‘有潜力、需改进’层面。

72

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2609.12571 (cs) [Submitted on 11 Sep 2026] Title:PIA-Bench: Towards Automated Privacy Impact Assessment with Large Language Models Authors:Jiamin Zheng, Hao-Ping Lee, Luo Mai, Jingjie Li View a PDF of the paper titled PIA-Bench: Towards Automated Privacy Impact Assessment with Large Language Models, by Jiamin Zheng and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Privacy impact assessment (PIA) is a critical instrument for institutions to proactively identify privacy risks and develop mitigation strategies before system deployment. While mandated across regulatory and institutional contexts, executing PIA requires extensive privacy and technical expertise, posing a particular challenge for teams without access to such resources. Prior work shows the potential of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to assist practitioners' privacy decisions, but little is known about how accurately and reliably LLMs can automate PIA. To this end, we develop PIA-Bench, the first open benchmark for evaluating LLMs on real-world PIAs. We first audited 499 expert-authored PIAs published by US federal agencies and curated 73 structured PIAs, comprising a total of 451 privacy risk and 831 mitigation items, to evaluate LLMs' ability to assess privacy risks and propose mitigations of complex systems. Our results show that off-the-shelf LLMs produce meaningful assessments and identify avenues for future improvement. Finally, we call for improving domain-specific workflows for LLM agents, developing accountable LLM infrastructure, and designing new quality standards for PIAs. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2609.12571 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2609.12571v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12571 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jiamin Zheng [view email] [v1] Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:16:03 UTC (265 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled PIA-Bench: Towards Automated Privacy Impact Assessment with Large Language Models, by Jiamin Zheng and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容