智能体
marktechpost.com ·
@Michal Sutter
Exa 发布 Agent Ultra:面向穷举式列表构建的子代理集群深度研究 API
Exa 推出 Agent Ultra,这是其 Exa Agent API 中 effort 最高的模式,通过协调多个子代理跨数千个来源进行列表构建和实体信息补全。Exa 称其在 4 项基准上优于 Opus 5.5、GPT-6 Astra 和 Perplexity Agent,其中在 WANDR 上软召回率为 81.4%。上述性能数据来自厂商自述,输入中未提供独立验证。
AI推荐理由 Exa 发布 Agent Ultra,作为 Exa Agent API 的最高 effort 模式,通过协调子代理跨数千来源做列表构建与实体补全,并称在 4 项基准上超过 Opus 5.5、GPT-6 Astra 和 Perplexity Agent,WANDR 软召回 81.4%;属产品发布信息,但性能数字为厂商自报,输入未提供独立复现或评测细节。
72
正文
Editors Pick
Agentic AI
AI Agents
Artificial Intelligence
AI Infrastructure
Technology
AI Shorts
Applications
New Releases
Software Engineering
Staff
Tech News
Exa has released Agent Ultra, the highest effort level of its Exa Agent API. It is built for research that must run to exhaustion: large list building, entity enrichment, and questions that need thousands of sources. Exa team reports that Ultra beats Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Perplexity Agent, each at maximum effort, on 4 research benchmarks.
Is it deployable? Yes, as a hosted API. Agent Ultra is live today on the Exa API by setting effort: "ultra". It is not open weights and cannot be self-hosted.
What is Exa Agent Ultra?
Exa Agent splits a task into subtasks and assigns subagents to research several domains at once. It routes frontier models to steps that need them and faster models where those are enough. Ultra is the mode that spends the most compute. According to the Agent Ultra docs, it runs longer than any other effort to return the most complete results.
Ultra runs typically finish complex tasks in about 30 minutes. Very hard tasks can take up to 3 hours.
Benchmark Results
All figures below are from Exa’s launch post. Competitors ran at their maximum effort setting.
Benchmark (metric)Agent UltraOpus 5.5GPT-6 AstraPerplexity AgentWANDR (soft recall)81.4%72.3%26.0%40.1%DeepSearchQA (F1)93.9%77.6%85.3%89.7%WideSearch (row-level F1)58.9%51.6%54.7%56.0%Company Find-All (avg. passing entities per task)2,45114611398
Exa pairs each result with a cost claim:
WANDR: +12.6% over Opus 5.5, at half its cost per task.
DeepSearchQA: +4.7% over Perplexity, at 46% lower cost per task than GPT-6 Astra.
WideSearch: +5.2% over Perplexity, at the lowest cost per task of the 4 systems.
Company Find-All: +1579% over Opus 5.5, at the lowest cost per entity found.
These gains are relative, not percentage points. On WANDR, the absolute gap to Opus 5.5 is 9.1 points.
Understanding These Numbers
WANDR is Perplexity’s benchmark of 500 wide and deep data-collection tasks, with an open harness. Exa’s grader shares the upstream evaluation logic. It swaps in Exa as the contents tool, changes transport logic, and uses gpt-6-luna as the judge. Where a vendor had published a result on this harness, Exa reports that figure. Otherwise, Exa ran the benchmark itself.
DeepSearchQA is Google DeepMind’s 900-prompt multi-step search benchmark. WideSearch tests broad information gathering. Exa evaluated up to 200 tasks each for WANDR and DeepSearchQA, and 100 each for WideSearch and Company Find-All. Graded task counts vary by provider. All results are vendor-reported and not yet independently reproduced.
Where Agent Ultra Fits
Exa lists 3 target user groups:
Model providers: assemble training data, such as every paper and repo implementing a given technique. Verify criteria like ‘released weights, not just an API’.
Financial services: build diligence market maps, run KYC research across filings and court records, and monitor portfolio signals.
Go-to-market teams: build account lists and enrich rows with judgment fields, each backed by a cited URL.
Ultra can also expand an existing list. Pass the rows you already have, and they are excluded from new results.
API, Pricing, and Controls
Ultra uses the standard Agent run endpoint. The request supports outputSchema, input.data, and streaming.
Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser
from exa_py import Exa
exa = Exa()
run = exa.agent.runs.create(
query="Find all companies building browser automation tools in the United States.",
effort="ultra",
)
run = exa.agent.runs.poll_until_finished(run.id, timeout_ms=3 * 60 * 60 * 1000)
print(run.stop_reason)
Pricing: metered at standard Agent usage rates, up to a default $20 per run. Runs that finish early cost less.
Budget: maxCostDollars accepts $1 to $100. maxDurationSeconds accepts 300 to 10,800 seconds.
Stopping: a stop call ends a run early, keeps its results, and bills usage up to that point.
Timeouts: SDK polling helpers time out after 1 hour by default, so set a longer timeout or stream events.
OpenAI compatibility: on /responses, set reasoning.effort: "ultra" with streaming or background mode.
You can test it in the Exa API Playground.
Comparison
Key Takeaways
Agent Ultra is Exa Agent’s highest effort mode, live now via API.
It orchestrates parallel subagents and mixes frontier and faster models.
Exa reports top scores on WANDR, DeepSearchQA, WideSearch, and Company Find-All.
Runs cost up to $20 by default, adjustable from $1 to $100.
Typical runs take about 30 minutes, with a 3 hour ceiling.
Check out the Technical Details. All credit goes to the researcher of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.
Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us
Michal Sutter
+ postsBio ⮌
Michal Sutter is a data science professional with a Master of Science in Data Science from the University of Padova. With a solid foundation in statistical analysis, machine learning, and data engineering, Michal excels at transforming complex datasets into actionable insights.
Michal Sutter
Perplexity Trains Its Computer Agent on Real Mistakes With Hint-Guided Self-Distillation
Michal Sutter
BottleCap AI Releases ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B: 37.2% Fewer Thinking Tokens at a 0.86pp Accuracy Cost
Michal Sutter
Contrastive-LM Releases CLM-8B: An Open System One Model That Scores Agent Actions Up to 9× Faster Than Jev
Michal Sutter
SpaceXAI Releases Grok 4.7: A Larger Base Model at the Same $2/$6 Price as Grok 4.6