最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

ClinLens:面向纵向多模态临床数据科学的长时程 LLM 智能体

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 ClinLens,一个以患者为中心的基准,用于评估 LLM 智能体在长时程临床数据科学工作流中的表现。基准包含 126 个可执行任务,覆盖 5 种数据模态、4 类分析范围和 5 项分析能力,考察智能体在证据定位、多模态整合与分析流程生成执行等相互依赖阶段中维持患者特定分析上下文的能力。作者评测了通用、编程与生物医学智能体,任务平均耗时 36.93 步、8.06 分钟;最强智能体执行成功率 86.4%、最终答案准确率 54.0%,但严格通过率仅 29.4%。失败分析显示患者病程定位是最常见的失败类别。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-26 修订),提出 ClinLens 患者中心基准,含 126 个可执行任务、覆盖 5 种数据模态、4 类分析范围与 5 项分析能力,用于评估 LLM 智能体在纵向多模态临床数据科学中的长时程工作流。摘要给出具体量化结果:任务平均 36.93 步、8.06 分钟,最强智能体执行成功率 86.4%、最终答案准确率 54.0%、严格通过率仅 29.4%,并指出患者病程定位是最常见失败类别。信息密度高、指标明确,对医疗 Agent 评测有实际参考价值;局限是仅摘要层面,未提供数据集规模细节与外部复现证据。

78

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2607.26155 (cs) [Submitted on 28 Jul 2026 (v1), last revised 26 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:ClinLens: Towards Long-Horizon LLM Agents for Longitudinal Multimodal Clinical Data Science Authors:Yuan Zhu, Ethan B. Liu, Frank Nie, Wei Fan, Haibo Pu, Jindong Han View a PDF of the paper titled ClinLens: Towards Long-Horizon LLM Agents for Longitudinal Multimodal Clinical Data Science, by Yuan Zhu and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Automating clinical data science requires agents to translate patient-centric objectives into executable workflows grounded in longitudinal multimodal evidence. Existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of two essential capabilities: grounding analyses in the correct patient episode and harmonizing multimodal observations. We introduce ClinLens, a patient-centric benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) agents on long-horizon clinical data science workflows. ClinLens comprises 126 executable tasks spanning five data modalities, four analytical scopes, and five analytical capabilities. The tasks assess agents' ability to maintain a coherent patient-specific analytical context across interdependent stages of evidence grounding, multimodal integration, and analytical pipeline generation and execution. We evaluate general-purpose, coding, and biomedical agents, with task runs averaging 36.93 steps and 8.06 minutes. The strongest evaluated agent achieves an execution success rate of 86.4% and a final-answer accuracy of 54.0%, but a strict pass rate of only 29.4%. Failure analysis identifies patient-episode grounding as the most frequently recorded failure category under the evaluation procedure. By jointly evaluating analytical outcomes and the validity of the supporting clinical context, ClinLens provides a testbed for advancing reliable agents for longitudinal clinical data science. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2607.26155 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2607.26155v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26155 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jindong Han [view email] [v1] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 18:01:48 UTC (41 KB) [v2] Sat, 26 Sep 2026 16:39:01 UTC (2,180 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled ClinLens: Towards Long-Horizon LLM Agents for Longitudinal Multimodal Clinical Data Science, by Yuan Zhu and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容