最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

论出行领域中 LLM 的安全与隐私

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 综述考察 LLM 在出行领域的应用与安全隐私挑战。作者依据欧盟 AI Act 对交通 AI 的高风险分类,推导出九个技术类别来评估现有研究与未来部署。结果显示,超过 50% 的被综述工作集中于 GPT 和 Llama 模型及交通应用,而安全、隐私和可靠性研究明显不足;在 35 篇被综述工作中,仅一篇包含部分漏洞评估,一篇包含部分风险管理系统。作者指出优化性能与合规之间存在明显差距,呼吁在安全攸关的智能交通系统中采用安全设计。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本综述,作者为 Mauro Conti 等,聚焦出行领域 LLM 的安全与隐私。具体新信息:从欧盟 AI Act 高风险要求推导出九个技术类别,用于评估现有研究;统计显示超过 50% 被综述工作集中在 GPT 和 Llama 模型及交通应用,而安全、隐私与可靠性被明显忽视;在 35 篇被综述工作中,仅一篇包含部分漏洞评估、一篇包含部分风险管理系统。局限:这是综述而非新实验,结论基于对既有文献的统计,且为预印本未经同行评审,摘要未给出具体漏洞类型或缓解方案。

72

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2609.26295 (cs) [Submitted on 22 Sep 2026] Title:On the security and privacy of LLMs in Mobility Authors:Mauro Conti, Lorenzo Perinello, Umberto Salviati View a PDF of the paper titled On the security and privacy of LLMs in Mobility, by Mauro Conti and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The mobility sector is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence. With a global market valued at approximately 2.9 trillion dollars annually, considering only cars, the integration of these technologies has the potential to impact more than 1.5 billion vehicles worldwide. As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in mobility, concerns about cybersecurity, privacy, and reliability emerge. Accordingly, this paper surveys current applications and assesses these challenges. Since the European AI Act classifies transportation AI as high risk, we derive nine technical classes from its requirements to assess current research and future deployments. Our findings show that research mainly studies GPT and Llama models (over 50\% of reviewed works) and traffic applications while largely neglecting security, privacy, and reliability. This gap extends to AI Act compliance: among 35 reviewed works, only one includes a partial vulnerability assessment and one a partial risk management system. We identify a clear gap between strong optimization performance and regulatory adherence, suggesting compliance is limited less by technology than by a focus on static performance over lifecycle safety, and underscoring an urgent need for security-by-design in safety-critical intelligent transportation systems. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.26295 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2609.26295v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26295 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Umberto Salviati [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:09:08 UTC (133 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled On the security and privacy of LLMs in Mobility, by Mauro Conti and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 论出行领域中 LLM 的安全与隐私 09-23 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容