大模型
arxiv.org ·
Mizan:面向伊拉克阿拉伯语与伊拉克公民语境的大模型国家基准
该论文提出 Mizan,一个评估 LLM 在伊拉克阿拉伯语及伊拉克公民语境表现的国家级基准,包含 MSA 基线赛道与伊拉克赛道,覆盖方言理解、方言生成、MSA-伊拉克语双向翻译、伊拉克专属知识、官方文档字段抽取和安全六个维度,由 340 条原创且经双重审核的题项构成,并对答案位置做统计审计、对每个公布分数给出 Wilson 区间。对 27 个系统的试点评测显示:MSA 赛道趋于饱和而伊拉克赛道具区分度,单模型差距稳定在 14-18 分;官方文档抽取任务中所有系统得分仅 32-56;两个阿拉伯语专用模型在伊拉克赛道低于同规模通用模型;最新模型家族的安全加固层会将无害的方言理解题确定性拒答,形成 MSA 基准无法发现的过度拒答模式。平台采用不可变快照、验证证书、人工发布门禁与公开撤稿等完整性协议。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,提出伊拉克阿拉伯语及伊拉克公民语境的国家级 LLM 评测基准 Mizan,含 340 条原创双审题项、六个评测轴(方言理解、方言生成、MSA-伊拉克语双向翻译、伊拉克专属知识、官方文档字段抽取、安全),并对 27 个系统做试点评测。具体新信息包括:MSA 赛道趋于饱和而伊拉克语赛道具区分度,单模型差距稳定在 14-18 分;官方文档抽取所有系统仅 32-56 分;两个阿拉伯语专用模型在伊拉克语赛道低于同规模通用模型;最新模型家族的安全加固层会把无害方言理解题确定性拒答,属 MSA 基准看不到的过度拒答模式。局限是仅摘要级证据、试点规模有限,且基准聚焦单一国家方言,通用性待验证。
78
正文
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.13980 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Sep 2026]
Title:Mizan: A National Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Iraqi Arabic and the Iraqi Civic Context
Authors:Nawar S. Alseelawi, Mustafa S. Aljumaily
View a PDF of the paper titled Mizan: A National Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Iraqi Arabic and the Iraqi Civic Context, by Nawar S. Alseelawi and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Arabic large-language-model (LLM) evaluation has matured around Modern Standard Arabic (MSA): aggregated leaderboards such as the Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard (OALL), HELM Arabic, and BALSAM rank models across dozens of MSA tasks, and frontier systems increasingly saturate them. Dialectal Arabic, the language Iraqis actually speak, remains nearly invisible to this infrastructure. We introduce Mizan ("the balance"), Iraq's national benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Iraqi Arabic and the Iraqi civic context: an MSA baseline track paired with an Iraqi track across six axes (dialect comprehension, dialect generation, bidirectional MSA-Iraqi translation, Iraq-specific knowledge, official-document field extraction, and safety), built from 340 originally authored, dually reviewed items with statistically audited answer positions and Wilson intervals on every published score. A pilot evaluation of 27 systems, spanning closed frontier models three days after release, open weights across size tiers, and an Arabic trio of commercial, open-specialized, and sovereign systems, yields four findings. The MSA track saturates while the Iraqi track discriminates, with a consistent 14-18-point per-model gap and statistically tied leaders. Official-document extraction confines every system to 32-56. Arabic-focused specialization behaves as MSA specialization: two dedicated Arabic models score below a size-matched generalist on the Iraqi track. And the safety-hardened tier of the newest model family deterministically refuses innocuous dialect-comprehension items as policy violations, an over-refusal mode invisible to MSA benchmarks. The platform enforces an integrity protocol of immutable snapshots, verification certificates, a human publication gate, and public retraction, all exercised during this study. Code and the public development set accompany the paper.
Comments:
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.13980 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.13980v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13980
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Nawar Alseelawi [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:52:16 UTC (404 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Mizan: A National Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Iraqi Arabic and the Iraqi Civic Context, by Nawar S. Alseelawi and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)