最新资讯
dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

面向LLM推理的KV缓存管理策略比较表征

原文 我的收藏

该论文对三种主流 KV 缓存管理框架 vLLM、InfiniGen 和 H2O 进行实证研究,这些框架分别采用张量卸载、token 驱逐启发式和推测调度等技术来平衡内存与性能。作者在请求率、模型规模和稀疏度等关键参数下,评估延迟、吞吐量和内存占用等指标,指出各框架表现最佳的条件,为内存与性能约束下的 KV 缓存策略选择与配置提供依据。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.AR/cs.AI),对 vLLM、InfiniGen、H2O 三种 KV 缓存管理框架做实证对比,覆盖延迟、吞吐、内存占用及请求率、模型规模、稀疏度等参数,并给出各框架最优适用条件。属于可验证的系统性评测,对 LLM 推理部署选型有直接参考价值;局限是仅摘要可见,具体实验数据与结论细节未提供,且为 v2 修订版而非首次发布。

78

正文

Computer Science > Hardware Architecture arXiv:2604.05012 (cs) [Submitted on 6 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 15 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Comparative Characterization of KV Cache Management Strategies for LLM Inference Authors:Oteo Mamo, Olga Kogiou, Hyunjin Yi, Weikuan Yu View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative Characterization of KV Cache Management Strategies for LLM Inference, by Oteo Mamo and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Efficient inference with Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly relies on Key-Value (KV) caches to store previously computed key and value vectors at each layer. These caches are essential to minimize redundant computation during autoregressive token generation, lowering computational complexity from quadratic to linear. However, the growth of KV caches has posed significant system-level challenges, particularly as model sizes increase, context lengths grow, and concurrent requests compete for limited memory resources. Even though several recent frameworks for KV cache management have emerged, their comparative trade-offs in memory consumption and inference performance have not been fully understood, especially under varying request sizes and model configurations. In this work, we conduct an empirical study of three state-of-the-art KV cache management frameworks: vLLM, InfiniGen, and H2O. These frameworks employ techniques such as tensor offloading, token eviction heuristics, and speculative scheduling to balance memory usage and performance. We evaluate their performance in terms of a range of metrics such as latency, throughput, and memory usage across a spectrum of key parameters including request rates, model sizes, and sparsity levels. Our results pinpoint the conditions for each framework to perform the best, revealing the most suitable selection and configuration of KV cache strategies under memory and performance constraints. Subjects: Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2604.05012 [cs.AR] (or arXiv:2604.05012v2 [cs.AR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.05012 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Oteo Mamo [view email] [v1] Mon, 6 Apr 2026 16:00:39 UTC (9,605 KB) [v2] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:46:36 UTC (9,605 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative Characterization of KV Cache Management Strategies for LLM Inference, by Oteo Mamo and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AR new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 面向LLM推理的KV缓存管理策略比较表征 09-16 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容