最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

ViSTA:一种将视觉对齐扩展到多模态 LLM 临床时间序列理解的简单桥接

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本提出 ViSTA,一个紧凑适配器,将不规则数值测量融入预训练视觉语言模型的图表表示,仅学习对视觉 token 的修正,保持所有预训练参数不变。在 MIMIC-IV 上,ViSTA 在 2-9B 参数模型的急性肾损伤与死亡率预测四项指标中取得对比适配方案的最高平均分;仅 0.516M 可训练参数的 2B 模型在 AKI 预测上 AUROC 达 0.7376,接近 GPT-5.6 Sol 文本输入高推理强度的 0.7380。时序问答训练在 4B 参数下准确率 69.27%,可训练参数比使用图表或数值文本的 LoRA 少 90% 以上,准确率差距 2.82-4.88 个百分点。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,摘要给出了具体方法(ViSTA 适配器,仅训练 0.516M 参数,冻结预训练参数)和可核验的量化结果(MIMIC-IV 上 AKI 预测 AUROC 0.7376,对比 GPT-5.6 Sol 文本输入 0.7380;时序问答 4B 参数下 69.27% 准确率)。新信息在于用轻量适配器把不规则临床时序数值接入视觉语言模型的图表表示,并声称在多个指标上优于对比适配方案。局限:仅预印本、未同行评审,结果限于 MIMIC-IV 单一数据集,摘要未提供完整基线细节,实际临床泛化能力未知。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.31448 (cs) [Submitted on 25 Sep 2026] Title:ViSTA: A Simple Bridge Extends Visual Alignment to Clinical Time-Series Understanding in Multimodal LLMs Authors:Junyi Gao, Yu Shi, Pingzhao Hu, Ewen M Harrison View a PDF of the paper titled ViSTA: A Simple Bridge Extends Visual Alignment to Clinical Time-Series Understanding in Multimodal LLMs, by Junyi Gao and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Clinical prediction models estimate risk from patient measurements, while large language models support medical text understanding and question answering. Yet their language capabilities do not ensure accurate prediction from structured, high-dimensional clinical time series. Improving this ability would connect risk estimation with flexible questions about a patient's evolving condition. We introduce ViSTA, a compact adapter that incorporates irregular numerical measurements into a pretrained vision-language model's chart representations. It learns corrections to visual tokens while leaving all pretrained parameters unchanged. On MIMIC-IV, ViSTA has the highest mean scores among the compared adaptations on all four metrics for acute kidney injury and mortality prediction across models with 2-9 billion parameters. With 0.516 million trainable parameters, the 2-billion-parameter model reaches an area under the ROC curve of 0.7376 for acute kidney injury, compared with GPT-5.6 Sol's 0.7380 with text input and high reasoning effort. Training for temporal question answering yields 69.27% accuracy at 4 billion parameters with over 90% fewer trainable parameters than low-rank adaptation using charts or numerical text, at a 2.82-4.88 percentage-point accuracy gap. ViSTA extends pretrained language models to numerical prediction and temporal questions. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.31448 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.31448v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31448 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Junyi Gao [view email] [v1] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:06:29 UTC (465 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled ViSTA: A Simple Bridge Extends Visual Alignment to Clinical Time-Series Understanding in Multimodal LLMs, by Junyi Gao and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容