最新资讯
dev.to osFoundry的Loop和Graph是什么,何时该用哪个? dev.to 限制上下文而非限制评审:面向开源补丁的字节预算证据包 dev.to 约束自主智能体:用 GKE Agent Sandbox 实现亚秒级零信任执行 dev.to 实测:给 Claude Code 十个翻译工具,三次运行中有一次完全不用 unite.ai Ramp 数据:企业 AI token 用量增速超过支出增速 pub.towardsai.net AI 生成的 ICLR 评审对被拒论文更宽松:如何压力测试你的 rebuttal wired.com AI 公司正积极收购企业工作文件与邮件用于模型训练 wechat 网友用AI搓出来的“App”,可以直接在小红书玩起来了? bloomberg.com 科技股抛售后,Anthropic IPO 估值承压 dev.to 当“按设计工作”成为问题:Claude Code 与 .NET 用户机密 dev.to 用代理修复 3500 个 Sonar 问题花 44 美元,让结果可信花 520 美元 dev.to 底层陷阱:为何企业 AI 使用率跑赢其 EBIT 影响
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 github.com · @Hacker News

Mold 链接器发布 v3.0.0,据称已用 Rust 重写

原文 我的收藏

mold 链接器发布 v3.0.0 版本,标题称其已用 Rust 重写。Hacker News 讨论中有人询问重写动机(如对损坏输入的边界检查)以及是否使用 AI 工具,有评论推测近期提交很可能借助了 AI,但该说法未获证实;另有评论认为在 C/C++ 代码库中修复损坏输入处理并非易事。

AI推荐理由 mold 链接器发布 v3.0.0,标题称已用 Rust 重写,属开发者工具链的重要版本更新;但正文片段仅含 HN 评论,未提供官方发布说明或重写细节,评论中关于是否使用 AI 工具的说法为推测('almost certainly'),不能视为已证实。

72

正文

Domain: github.com/rui314 Points: 20 | Comments: 5 [Top Comments] - I'm curious about motivation - bounds checks for corrupted inputs seems like it would be one, but it also seems that fixing corrupted input handling in a C/C++ code base would not be too hard, and probably less of an effort? So why did you choose the rewrite? And second, did you use any AI tools for the rewrite? - > And second, did you use any AI tools for the rewrite? IMO, given the recent commits: almost certainly. - [delayed] - > fixing corrupted input handling in a C/C++ code base would not be too hard The best programmers on the planet have tried and failed with this task for 50 years now, so I don't think this is true. The main disadvantage of Rust right now is not supporting some more obscure platforms, but because mold wouldn't support them anyway I don't see that as a problem. - unfortunate world we live in, the amount of trustable/ethical software is going to near zero.

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容