最新资讯
dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP theverge.com OpenAI 宣布数据中心项目不再与公职人员签署保密协议 dev.to NVIDIA 发布四个开放 Cosmos 3 仿真模型 dev.to 真实 MCP 客户端击穿我们服务器的五种方式 theverge.com Airbnb 正在开发 AI 旅行 agent,计划 2027 年上半年推出 wechat 这可能是美国AI最魔幻的一天。 nytimes.com 美众议院共和党领袖要求 Nvidia 黄仁勋闭门简报 pub.towardsai.net 忘掉我:为记忆而设计的系统中的删除难题 marktechpost.com Google 发布 Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash:15 秒视频,每秒 0.07 美元
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

符号关系与证明方法:基于大语言模型的论证结构跨体裁研究

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文(cs.CL,2026-09-14 提交)提出四类受符号学四大修辞格启发的符号关系——组合、聚合、对立与部分整体,分别对应转喻、隐喻、反讽与提喻,并认为这些关系决定从命题 S 转向 S* 的路径,从而对应推断证明、类比证明、反证与分情况讨论。作者将其转化为可操作定义,用一组大语言模型对数学、法律与日常论证的跨体裁语料进行实证,发现四类关系在不同体裁中使用极不均衡:数学证明四类均用,法律与日常推理几乎只依赖推断。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式提交的 cs.CL 论文,作者与摘要明确,信息密度较高。核心新信息是提出四类符号学关系(对应转喻、隐喻、反讽、提喻)并映射到四种证明方法,再用 LLM 面板对数学、法律、日常论证的跨体裁语料做实证,发现数学证明四类关系均用,而法律与日常推理几乎只用推断。局限在于摘要未给出语料规模、LLM 具体型号与评测指标,结论的稳健性无法从片段判断;对 LLM 推理与论证结构研究有参考价值,但偏理论,短期落地价值有限。

62

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.15194 (cs) [Submitted on 14 Sep 2026] Title:Semiotic Relations and Proof Methods: A Cross-Genre Study of Argument Structure with Large Language Models Authors:Edirlei Soares de Lima, Marco A. Casanova, Antonio L. Furtado View a PDF of the paper titled Semiotic Relations and Proof Methods: A Cross-Genre Study of Argument Structure with Large Language Models, by Edirlei Soares de Lima and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:When a direct proof of a statement $S$ seems hard or even impossible to obtain, there may exist another statement (or set of statements) $S^{*}$, somehow related to $S$, on the basis of which $S$ can be proved. In order to investigate what options can be used to move from $S$ to $S^{*}$, four kinds of semiotic relations inspired by the four master tropes of semiotic research are briefly reviewed. Specifically, our syntagmatic, paradigmatic, antithetic and meronymic relations correspond, respectively, to metonymy, metaphor, irony and synecdoche. It is suggested that these four semiotic relations determine the options to move from $S$ to $S^{*}$, leading to proof by inference, proof by analogy, proof by contradiction, and proof by case analysis. To examine how the four relations are actually used across different kinds of argument, we complement the framework with an empirical study. We turn the four relations into explicit operational definitions and apply them to a cross-genre corpus of mathematical, legal, and everyday argument using a panel of large language models. We find that the relations are used very unevenly across genres: mathematical proofs draw on all four, whereas legal and everyday reasoning rely almost entirely on inference. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.15194 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.15194v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15194 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Edirlei Soares De Lima PhD [view email] [v1] Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:13:00 UTC (2,339 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Semiotic Relations and Proof Methods: A Cross-Genre Study of Argument Structure with Large Language Models, by Edirlei Soares de Lima and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容