最新资讯
dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP theverge.com OpenAI 宣布数据中心项目不再与公职人员签署保密协议 dev.to NVIDIA 发布四个开放 Cosmos 3 仿真模型 dev.to 真实 MCP 客户端击穿我们服务器的五种方式 theverge.com Airbnb 正在开发 AI 旅行 agent,计划 2027 年上半年推出 wechat 这可能是美国AI最魔幻的一天。
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

通过推理过程错误分类提升大型语言模型的数学推理能力

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文聚焦 LLM 在数学数据集上产生错误答案的推理过程,人工分析并定义、分类了 21 类推理错误,识别出高频错误类别。作者据此设计显式关注 8 类错误的提示词,实验表明该提示能有效提升推理表现,并提示同类规模 LLM 的高频推理错误具有共性。摘要未披露具体数据集、基线模型与提升幅度。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式提交的 cs.CL 论文,作者对 LLM 数学推理错误进行人工分析,定义并分类了 21 类推理错误,并识别高频错误类别;随后设计聚焦 8 类错误的提示词,实验显示可提升推理表现,并提示同类规模 LLM 的高频推理错误具有共性。新信息在于错误分类体系与基于错误类别的提示改进方法,对推理能力优化和评测有参考价值;局限是摘要未给出具体数据集、基线模型、提升幅度和统计显著性,效果需查看全文验证。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.15145 (cs) [Submitted on 14 Sep 2026] Title:Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Reasoning Process Error Classification Authors:Runa Yoshida, Kosuke Nishida, Kyosuke Nishida View a PDF of the paper titled Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Reasoning Process Error Classification, by Runa Yoshida and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) is a critical factor for practical LLM-based applications. To investigate the current reasoning capability of LLMs, we clarify the types of errors that arise in LLMs' reasoning processes on mathematical datasets. We focus on problems where LLMs produce an incorrect answer. We define errors in the reasoning process as reasoning errors and manually analyze the features of reasoning errors. We defined and classified 21 error classes and identified the frequently occurring classes among them. Beyond qualitative evaluation, we leverage the evaluation results to improve the reasoning capability. We designed a prompt that explicitly focuses on eight error classes. The experiments demonstrate that this prompt effectively improves reasoning performance. Furthermore, the results suggest that the frequent reasoning errors identified in this paper are common across LLMs of comparable scale. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.15145 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.15145v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15145 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Runa Yoshida [view email] [v1] Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:20:44 UTC (53 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Reasoning Process Error Classification, by Runa Yoshida and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容