大模型
arxiv.org ·
通过推理过程错误分类提升大型语言模型的数学推理能力
该 arXiv 论文聚焦 LLM 在数学数据集上产生错误答案的推理过程,人工分析并定义、分类了 21 类推理错误,识别出高频错误类别。作者据此设计显式关注 8 类错误的提示词,实验表明该提示能有效提升推理表现,并提示同类规模 LLM 的高频推理错误具有共性。摘要未披露具体数据集、基线模型与提升幅度。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式提交的 cs.CL 论文,作者对 LLM 数学推理错误进行人工分析,定义并分类了 21 类推理错误,并识别高频错误类别;随后设计聚焦 8 类错误的提示词,实验显示可提升推理表现,并提示同类规模 LLM 的高频推理错误具有共性。新信息在于错误分类体系与基于错误类别的提示改进方法,对推理能力优化和评测有参考价值;局限是摘要未给出具体数据集、基线模型、提升幅度和统计显著性,效果需查看全文验证。
72
正文
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.15145 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Sep 2026]
Title:Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Reasoning Process Error Classification
Authors:Runa Yoshida, Kosuke Nishida, Kyosuke Nishida
View a PDF of the paper titled Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Reasoning Process Error Classification, by Runa Yoshida and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) is a critical factor for practical LLM-based applications. To investigate the current reasoning capability of LLMs, we clarify the types of errors that arise in LLMs' reasoning processes on mathematical datasets. We focus on problems where LLMs produce an incorrect answer. We define errors in the reasoning process as reasoning errors and manually analyze the features of reasoning errors. We defined and classified 21 error classes and identified the frequently occurring classes among them. Beyond qualitative evaluation, we leverage the evaluation results to improve the reasoning capability. We designed a prompt that explicitly focuses on eight error classes. The experiments demonstrate that this prompt effectively improves reasoning performance. Furthermore, the results suggest that the frequent reasoning errors identified in this paper are common across LLMs of comparable scale.
Comments:
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.15145 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.15145v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15145
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Runa Yoshida [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:20:44 UTC (53 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Reasoning Process Error Classification, by Runa Yoshida and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)