最新资讯
dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

ChartAnno:面向多模态大语言模型图表标注生成的基准评测

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 ChartAnno 基准,用于评测多模态大语言模型(MLLM)的图表标注生成能力。基准包含 1200 张真实图表及其成对的带标注与无标注可执行代码,以及 3600 条分三个具体程度层级的标注指令,并配套结合规则与 LLM 评判的多维评测框架,覆盖执行、结构合规、语义一致性与设计有效性。作者在“仅图表代码”和“代码+图表图像”两种输入设置下评测 10 个代表性 MLLM,结果显示专有模型整体领先、开源模型差距缩小;指令越具体标注质量越高,但推断抽象沟通意图对所有模型仍困难;在已有代码时提供图表图像收益有限。论文还通过仅图像消融、任务复杂度与指令层级分析刻画常见失败模式,并验证 LLM 评判的可靠性,同时用 D3 与 SVG 实验验证基准在 Python 主设置之外的泛化性。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-14 修订),来源可信、信息密度高:提出 ChartAnno 基准,含 1200 张真实图表、成对的带标注/无标注可执行代码,以及 3600 条覆盖三个具体程度层级的标注指令;并给出规则与 LLM 评判结合的多维评测框架,评测 10 个代表性 MLLM,在“仅图表代码”和“代码+图表图像”两种输入设置下比较。具体新信息包括:专有模型整体领先但开源模型差距缩小;指令越具体标注质量越高,但推断抽象沟通意图对所有模型都困难;在已有代码时提供图表图像收益有限;另做仅图像消融、任务复杂度与指令层级分析、失败模式刻画及 LLM 评判可靠性验证,并用 D3 与 SVG 验证泛化性。局限是摘要未给出具体分数与模型名单,且基准本身为作者自建,实际效果仍需看全文。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.03464 (cs) [Submitted on 4 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 14 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:ChartAnno: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Chart Annotation Generation Authors:Zhenghan Chen, Zekai Shao, Lidan Tan, Xin Lin, Xingchen Zeng, Yi Shan, Ziyue Lin, Xiaoliang Fu, Xinyuan Liu, Yuetong Guo, Fen Wang, Bongshin Lee, Siming Chen View a PDF of the paper titled ChartAnno: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Chart Annotation Generation, by Zhenghan Chen and 12 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Annotations are essential to communicative visualization, helping explain data, emphasize key findings, and guide attention. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer new opportunities for automatic chart annotation authoring, their capabilities in this task remain underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce ChartAnno, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on chart annotation generation. ChartAnno contains 1,200 real-world charts with paired annotated and unannotated executable code, along with 3,600 annotation instructions spanning three levels of specificity. We also develop a multidimensional evaluation framework combining rule-based and LLM-judged metrics to assess execution, structural compliance, semantic consistency, and design effectiveness. We evaluate 10 representative MLLMs under two primary chart input settings: (1) chart code alone and (2) both code and chart image. Results reveal that proprietary models lead overall, though open-source models narrow the gap. While higher instruction specificity improves annotation quality, inferring abstract communicative intent remains difficult across all models. Providing chart images yields marginal benefit when code is available. We also examine the effect of chart code through an image-only ablation and analyze the effects of multiple task complexity indicators and instruction-level transitions. Further analyses characterize common failure modes and validate the reliability of the LLM-based judge. Experiments with D3 and SVG demonstrate the generalizability of ChartAnno beyond its primary Python setting. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2608.03464 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.03464v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03464 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Zhenghan Chen [view email] [v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:01:38 UTC (31,931 KB) [v2] Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:55:45 UTC (31,925 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled ChartAnno: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Chart Annotation Generation, by Zhenghan Chen and 12 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容