最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org · @Hao Wang

TruthInsightBench:面向开放科学发现智能体的证据基础评估基准

原文 我的收藏

TruthInsightBench是一个新基准,旨在评估自主科学发现智能体,而非仅复现已知结果。它包含40个盲任务,来自10个科学领域的40项同行评审研究,仅提供中性目标和冻结数据,隐藏结论和路径。采用固定LLM评判器,从六个维度评估智能体主张的证据成熟度,共29个基于工件的项目,自动化聚合,无需人工分级,支持重复评估。

AI推荐理由 提出TruthInsightBench基准,针对开放科学发现智能体的评估,包含40个盲任务,覆盖10个科学领域,采用固定LLM评判器自动评分,无需人工分级,可重复评估。信息密度高,来源为arXiv预印本,但需注意其方法有效性未经同行评审。

85

正文

计算机科学 > 人工智能 arXiv:2609.05079v1 (cs) [2026年9月4日提交] 标题:TruthInsightBench:用于自动评估开放式科学发现代理的基于证据的基准 作者:Zhibo Yang, Chen Zhang, Yuewei Zhang, Hao Wang 查看论文《TruthInsightBench:用于自动评估开放式科学发现代理的基于证据的基准》的PDF,作者为Zhibo Yang等4人 查看PDF HTML(实验性) 摘要:自主编码代理越来越多地被提议作为AI科学家系统,进行分析和撰写研究报告,但执行规定的分析与做出发现不同。现有基准是为复现而配置的:任务、数据和评分标准围绕隐藏的目标研究构建,并奖励恢复其结果。我们提出了TruthInsightBench,一个为发现而配置的基准。其40个盲任务取自10个科学领域的40项同行评审研究,仅暴露中立的科学目标和冻结的数据;源结论、预期值和分析路径被隐藏,让代理自行确定数据支持什么主张。一个固定的基于LLM的评判者沿着六个维度对代理自身主张的证据成熟度进行评分,操作化为29个基于工件的项目,具有自动、确定性的聚合,无需逐实例人工评分,因此随着代理的发展,评估可以自动重复。在一个冻结的基础模型上,四个编码代理形成一个狭窄的平台(58.4-60.3分,满分100),没有统计上可靠的成对分离:它们能胜任地执行和记录分析,具有相对较强的证据可审计性和新颖性,但在很大程度上缺乏建立可信主张的判别行为(控制、稳健性、可证伪性和跨数据集泛化)。瓶颈是科学判断而非编码,真正的发现仍然遥不可及。TruthInsightBench使这一差距成为可测量的目标;数据和评分代码位于此https URL。 评论: 主题: 人工智能 (cs.AI);计算与语言 (cs.CL) 引用为: arXiv:2609.05079 [cs.AI] (或 arXiv:2609.05079v1 [cs.AI] 用于此版本) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05079 聚焦了解更多 arXiv发布的DOI(通过DataCite,待注册) 提交历史 来自:Hao Wang [查看电子邮件] [v1] 2026年9月4日星期五 12:37:20 UTC (979 KB) 全文链接: 访问论文: 查看论文《TruthInsightBench:用于自动评估开放式科学发现代理的基于证据的基准》的PDF,作者为Zhibo Yang等4人 查看PDF HTML(实验性) TeX源 查看许可证 当前浏览上下文: cs.AI 新 | 最近 | 2026-09 更改为浏览: cs cs.CL 参考文献与引用 NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar 导出BibTeX引用 加载中... BibTeX格式引用 × 加载中... 数据提供: 书签 书目工具 书目与引用工具 书目浏览器切换 书目浏览器(什么是浏览器?) 关联论文切换 关联论文(什么是关联论文?) Litmaps切换 Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?) scite.ai切换 scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?) 代码、数据、媒体 与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体 alphaXiv切换 alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?) 代码链接切换 CatalyzeX代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?) DagsHub切换 DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?) GotitPub切换 Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?) Huggingface切换 Hugging Face(什么是Huggingface?) ScienceCast切换 ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?) 演示 演示 Replicate切换 Replicate(什么是Replicate?) Spaces切换 Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?) Spaces切换 TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?) 相关论文 推荐与搜索工具 链接到Influence Flower Influence Flower(什么是Influence Flowers?) 核心推荐器切换 CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?) 作者 地点 机构 主题 关于arXivLabs arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目 arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。 与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都接受并认可我们的开放性、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私价值观。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。 有一个能为arXiv社区增加价值的项目想法吗?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。 这篇论文的哪些作者是背书人? | 禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.05079v1 (cs) [Submitted on 4 Sep 2026] Title:TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents Authors:Zhibo Yang, Chen Zhang, Yuewei Zhang, Hao Wang View a PDF of the paper titled TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents, by Zhibo Yang and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Autonomous coding agents are increasingly proposed as AI-scientist systems that conduct analyses and write research reports, but executing a prescribed analysis is not the same as making a discovery. Existing benchmarks are configured for reproduction: tasks, data, and rubrics are built around a hidden target study, and recovery of its result is rewarded. We present TruthInsightBench, a benchmark configured for discovery. Its 40 blind tasks, drawn from 40 peer-reviewed studies across 10 scientific domains, expose only a neutral scientific objective and frozen data; source conclusions, expected values, and analysis paths are withheld, leaving the agent to determine what claim the data support. A fixed LLM-based judge scores the evidentiary maturity of an agent's own claims along six dimensions, operationalized as 29 artifact-grounded items, with automated, deterministic aggregation and no per-instance human grading, so evaluation can be repeated automatically as agents evolve. On one frozen base model, four coding agents form a narrow plateau (58.4-60.3 of 100) with no statistically reliable pairwise separation: they execute and document analyses competently, with comparatively strong evidence auditability and novelty, but largely lack the discriminating acts that establish a trustworthy claim (controls, robustness, falsifiability, and cross-dataset generalization). The bottleneck is scientific judgment rather than coding, and genuine discovery remains out of reach. TruthInsightBench makes this gap a measurable target; data and scoring code are at this https URL. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.05079 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.05079v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05079 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Hao Wang [view email] [v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 12:37:20 UTC (979 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents, by Zhibo Yang and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容