最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

CHI 上的写作发生了怎样的变化?分析 LLM 引入前后 44 年的 CHI 论文写作

原文 我的收藏

该研究分析 1982 至 2026 年全部 44 届 CHI 会议共 14,262 篇论文全文,考察可读性、语域、词汇多样性与 LLM 典型标记词。结果显示,LLM 公开后 CHI 行文并未如假设般同质化,词汇多样性上升、句子节奏仍不规则;2016–2026 年的文风变化大于此前各十年,阅读难度自 2022 年起下降。词级变化在作者使用 LLM 之前即已出现,说明 LLM 并非变化起点,而是加速因素。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者为 Thomas Kosch 等,基于 1982–2026 年全部 44 届 CHI 会议共 14,262 篇论文全文,测量可读性、语域、词汇多样性和 LLM 特征词。核心发现与常见假设相反:LLM 出现后 CHI 行文并未同质化,词汇反而更多样、句长节奏仍不规则;2016–2026 年变化大于此前各十年,阅读难度自 2022 年起下降;词级变化在作者使用 LLM 之前就已开始,LLM 是加速而非起点。局限是仅覆盖 CHI 单一会议、属相关性分析,无法确立因果,且为预印本未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction arXiv:2609.23090 (cs) [Submitted on 19 Sep 2026] Title:How Did Writing Change At CHI? Analyzing 44 Years of CHI Writing Before and After the Introduction of Large Language Models Authors:Thomas Kosch, Robin Welsch, Michael Hedderich, Christopher Katins View a PDF of the paper titled How Did Writing Change At CHI? Analyzing 44 Years of CHI Writing Before and After the Introduction of Large Language Models, by Thomas Kosch and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) reshaped scientific discourse at a linguistic level. LLMs are assumed to homogenize academic writing, flattening it into a single generic lexical register. To understand how CHI writing has changed since the public release of LLMs, we analyzed full texts of 14,262 archival papers across all 44 CHI proceedings from 1982 to 2026, measuring readability, register, lexical diversity, and marker words typically produced by LLMs. We find that prose did not homogenize, while vocabulary grew more varied, and sentence rhythm remained irregular. CHI prose changed more between 2016 and 2026 than in other decades toward greater density, and reading ease has declined since 2022. The word-level shift began before any author used LLMs, so LLMs did not start the change but accelerated it. Reflecting on the history of CHI papers, we discuss what may have caused changes in prose and how LLMs accelerated them. Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2609.23090 [cs.HC] (or arXiv:2609.23090v1 [cs.HC] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23090 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Thomas Kosch [view email] [v1] Sat, 19 Sep 2026 15:49:15 UTC (331 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled How Did Writing Change At CHI? Analyzing 44 Years of CHI Writing Before and After the Introduction of Large Language Models, by Thomas Kosch and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.HC new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容