大模型
arxiv.org ·
CHI 上的写作发生了怎样的变化?分析 LLM 引入前后 44 年的 CHI 论文写作
该研究分析 1982 至 2026 年全部 44 届 CHI 会议共 14,262 篇论文全文,考察可读性、语域、词汇多样性与 LLM 典型标记词。结果显示,LLM 公开后 CHI 行文并未如假设般同质化,词汇多样性上升、句子节奏仍不规则;2016–2026 年的文风变化大于此前各十年,阅读难度自 2022 年起下降。词级变化在作者使用 LLM 之前即已出现,说明 LLM 并非变化起点,而是加速因素。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者为 Thomas Kosch 等,基于 1982–2026 年全部 44 届 CHI 会议共 14,262 篇论文全文,测量可读性、语域、词汇多样性和 LLM 特征词。核心发现与常见假设相反:LLM 出现后 CHI 行文并未同质化,词汇反而更多样、句长节奏仍不规则;2016–2026 年变化大于此前各十年,阅读难度自 2022 年起下降;词级变化在作者使用 LLM 之前就已开始,LLM 是加速而非起点。局限是仅覆盖 CHI 单一会议、属相关性分析,无法确立因果,且为预印本未经同行评审。
72
正文
Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction
arXiv:2609.23090 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 Sep 2026]
Title:How Did Writing Change At CHI? Analyzing 44 Years of CHI Writing Before and After the Introduction of Large Language Models
Authors:Thomas Kosch, Robin Welsch, Michael Hedderich, Christopher Katins
View a PDF of the paper titled How Did Writing Change At CHI? Analyzing 44 Years of CHI Writing Before and After the Introduction of Large Language Models, by Thomas Kosch and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) reshaped scientific discourse at a linguistic level. LLMs are assumed to homogenize academic writing, flattening it into a single generic lexical register. To understand how CHI writing has changed since the public release of LLMs, we analyzed full texts of 14,262 archival papers across all 44 CHI proceedings from 1982 to 2026, measuring readability, register, lexical diversity, and marker words typically produced by LLMs. We find that prose did not homogenize, while vocabulary grew more varied, and sentence rhythm remained irregular. CHI prose changed more between 2016 and 2026 than in other decades toward greater density, and reading ease has declined since 2022. The word-level shift began before any author used LLMs, so LLMs did not start the change but accelerated it. Reflecting on the history of CHI papers, we discuss what may have caused changes in prose and how LLMs accelerated them.
Subjects:
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.23090 [cs.HC]
(or
arXiv:2609.23090v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23090
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Thomas Kosch [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 19 Sep 2026 15:49:15 UTC (331 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled How Did Writing Change At CHI? Analyzing 44 Years of CHI Writing Before and After the Introduction of Large Language Models, by Thomas Kosch and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)