最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 arxiv.org · @Andrés Peri

大规模写作评估中AI辅助评分的人机协同框架

原文 我的收藏

该研究提出一种AI辅助评分框架,用于大规模国家考试中的短文写作(约150-200词),采用人在回路策略以保持质量并减少人工工作量。基于两届约5000份学生回答的数据,分析AI评分与人类评分者在多个维度的一致性,结果显示在多数维度上达到中等到高度一致,并评估了决策流程对通过/失败结果的影响。

AI推荐理由 针对大规模写作评估的AI辅助评分框架,采用人在回路策略,基于真实国家考试数据,报告模型与人类评分的一致性。应用场景明确,但领域较窄,对AI核心进展贡献有限。

65

正文

计算机科学 > 计算与语言 arXiv:2609.05143v1 (cs) [提交于2026年9月4日] 标题:大规模写作评估中AI辅助评分的人机协同框架 作者:María Eugenia Curi, Germán Capdehourat, Isabel Amigo, Magdalena Romano, Rosana Serra, Adrián Silveira, Andrés Peri 查看论文PDF,标题为“大规模写作评估中AI辅助评分的人机协同框架”,作者:María Eugenia Curi等7人 查看PDF HTML(实验性) 摘要:人工智能(AI),特别是大型语言模型(LLM)融入教育评估,为提升评分过程的效率和可扩展性开辟了新机遇。本研究展示了一个用于大规模国家评估中书面回答的AI辅助评分框架的设计与验证。所提出的方法聚焦于约150-200词的短篇书面文本,并采用人机协同策略,在减少人工工作量的同时保持评估质量。该研究基于真实操作环境,使用了最近两届全国性测试的数据,每届包含约5000份学生回答。我们分析了AI生成分数与人工评分者在多个评分维度上的一致性,以及所提出的决策流程对及格/不及格结果的影响。结果显示,在大多数维度上,模型与人工评估之间具有中度至高度的一致性,支持了AI辅助在此环境中的可行性。此外,所提出的纠正工作流识别出人工审查最有价值的情况,从而能够更有效地分配专家精力。研究结果表明,只有当与精心设计的人工监督相结合时,AI辅助评分才能安全地融入大规模评估流程。论文最后讨论了在国家评估系统中部署的实际意义,并概述了未来研究方向,包括模型与人工一致性的纵向监测以及AI支持的审查工作流可能引入的认知偏差分析。 评论: 主题: 计算与语言 (cs.CL);人工智能 (cs.AI) 引用格式: arXiv:2609.05143 [cs.CL] (或 arXiv:2609.05143v1 [cs.CL] 用于此版本) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05143 聚焦了解更多 arXiv发布的DOI(通过DataCite,待注册) 提交历史 来自:German Capdehourat [查看电子邮件] [v1] 2026年9月4日星期五 13:47:29 UTC (177 KB) 全文链接: 访问论文: 查看论文PDF,标题为“大规模写作评估中AI辅助评分的人机协同框架”,作者:María Eugenia Curi等7人 查看PDF HTML(实验性) TeX源文件 查看许可证 当前浏览上下文: cs.CL 新 | 最近 | 2026-09 更改浏览方式: cs cs.AI 参考文献与引用 NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar 导出BibTeX引用 加载中... BibTeX格式引用 × 加载中... 数据提供: 书签 书目工具 书目与引用工具 书目浏览器切换 书目浏览器(什么是浏览器?) 关联论文切换 关联论文(什么是关联论文?) Litmaps切换 Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?) scite.ai切换 scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?) 代码、数据、媒体 与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体 alphaXiv切换 alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?) 代码链接切换 CatalyzeX论文代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?) DagsHub切换 DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?) GotitPub切换 Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?) Huggingface切换 Hugging Face(什么是Hugging Face?) ScienceCast切换 ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?) 演示 演示 Replicate切换 Replicate(什么是Replicate?) Spaces切换 Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?) Spaces切换 TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?) 相关论文 推荐与搜索工具 链接到Influence Flower Influence Flower(什么是Influence Flower?) 核心推荐器切换 CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?) 作者 会议/期刊 机构 主题 关于arXivLabs arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目 arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。 与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都接受并认可我们的价值观:开放、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。 有一个能为arXiv社区增加价值的项目想法吗?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。 这篇论文的哪些作者是背书人? | 禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.05143v1 (cs) [Submitted on 4 Sep 2026] Title:A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessment Authors:María Eugenia Curi, Germán Capdehourat, Isabel Amigo, Magdalena Romano, Rosana Serra, Adrián Silveira, Andrés Peri View a PDF of the paper titled A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessment, by Mar\'ia Eugenia Curi and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), into educational assessment has opened new opportunities to enhance the efficiency and scalability of grading processes. This study presents the design and validation of an AI-assisted scoring framework for written responses in a large-scale national assessment. The proposed approach focuses on short written texts of approximately 150-200 words and incorporates a human-in-the-loop strategy to preserve assessment quality while reducing manual workload. The study is grounded in a real operational context, using data from two recent editions of a nationwide test, each comprising approximately 5,000 student responses. We analyze the alignment between AI-generated scores and human raters across multiple rubric dimensions, as well as the impact of the proposed decision flow on pass/fail outcomes. Results show moderate to high agreement between the model and human evaluations in most dimensions, supporting the feasibility of AI assistance in this setting. Moreover, the proposed correction workflow identifies cases where human review is most valuable, enabling a more efficient allocation of expert effort. The findings suggest that AI-assisted scoring can be safely integrated into large-scale assessment processes only when combined with carefully designed human oversight. The paper concludes by discussing practical implications for deployment in national assessment systems and outlining future research directions, including longitudinal monitoring of model-human alignment and the analysis of potential cognitive bias introduced by AI-supported review workflows. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.05143 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.05143v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05143 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: German Capdehourat [view email] [v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 13:47:29 UTC (177 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessment, by Mar\'ia Eugenia Curi and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容