最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

引导 LLM 回应趋向挪威 MFQ-30 上的道德基础

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本将挪威语道德基础问卷 MFQ-30 施测于六个开源权重 LLM,并与 1,282 名挪威受访者样本对比。结果显示仅一半模型通过注意力检查,其余输出趋中;不含人类分布信息的中性北欧受访者 persona 可使参与模型在 Mahalanobis d² 上靠近挪威均值 44-77%;固定中层单对 ActAdd 会压平而非定向调整道德基础画像,且同一 persona 对至少一个模型诱发了基线不存在的参与行为。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,方法描述具体:对六个开源权重 LLM 施测挪威语 MFQ-30,与 N=1,282 挪威受访者样本对比,并测试 prompt 级 persona steering 与激活级 ActAdd 两种干预。新信息在于:一半模型通过注意力检查、另一半输出趋中;中性北欧受访者 persona 在 Mahalanobis d² 上使参与模型靠近挪威均值 44-77%;固定中层单对 ActAdd 反而压平道德基础画像;并报告同一 persona 可诱发基线不存在的参与行为,呼应 Peereboom 等(2025)的 cognitive phantoms 警告。局限是仅六个模型、单一问卷与挪威样本,ActAdd 结论限于特定层与单对设置,且为预印本未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.21636 (cs) [Submitted on 18 Sep 2026] Title:Steering LLMs Responses Towards Moral Foundations on the Norwegian MFQ-30 Authors:Hans Andersen, David Dichas View a PDF of the paper titled Steering LLMs Responses Towards Moral Foundations on the Norwegian MFQ-30, by Hans Andersen and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Recent work applies human psychometric questionnaires to large language models to elicit moral and value profiles, but it is not clear whether these instruments measure anything stable in models or whether the resulting profiles can be moved toward a target human population. We administer the Norwegian Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-30) to six open-weight LLMs and compare their foundation profiles to a sample of N = 1,282 Norwegian respondents. We test two steering interventions, prompt-level persona steering and activation-level ActAdd. Half the models engage with the questionnaire under our attention check. The other half default to flat or central-tendency outputs that look near-human on average without tracking item content. A neutral Nordic-respondent persona, written without any distributional information from the human sample, brings the engaging models 44-77% closer to the Norwegian mean in Mahalanobis $d^2$. One-pair ActAdd at a fixed mid-layer flattens the foundation profile rather than steering individual foundations. For at least one model the same persona that shifts the profile also induces engagement that was absent at baseline, a concrete instance of the cognitive phantoms that Peereboom et al. (2025) warn about. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2609.21636 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.21636v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21636 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Hans Andersen [view email] [v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:25:22 UTC (546 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Steering LLMs Responses Towards Moral Foundations on the Norwegian MFQ-30, by Hans Andersen and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 引导 LLM 回应趋向挪威 MFQ-30 上的道德基础 09-21 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容