表格应该排序吗？以大语言模型重新审视

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms arXiv:2609.14032 (cs) [Submitted on 12 Sep 2026] Title:Should Tables Be Sorted? Revisited with a Large Language Model Authors:Songhua He View a PDF of the paper titled Should Tables Be Sorted? Revisited with a Large Language Model, by Songhua He View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We revisit the implicit membership problem in Yao's full-table model [Yao, 1981] and obtain, to our knowledge, the first quantitative improvements to his 45-year-old Ramsey bounds, most notably reducing the two-probe bound from tower-type to polynomial. In this model, an $n$-set $S\subseteq\{1,\ldots,m\}$ is stored as a permutation in an $n$-cell table, and queries decide whether $x\in S$. Let $G_q(n)$ be the largest universe size admitting a $q$-probe membership scheme for all $n$-sets. Yao determined the one-probe case exactly, proving $G_1(n)=2n-2$ for $n>2$, but the behavior for $q\ge2$ remained wide open. Fiat and Naor [1993] constructed schemes for universes of size $\exp(n^c)$ for some constant $c>0$ and sufficiently large constant $q$. For the first adaptive case, $q=2$, we prove $G_2(n)=O(n^2(\log n)^2)$. For every fixed integer $q\ge3$, we show that $G_q(n)$ is at most a tower of height $q-1$ with top $n^{1+o(1)}$; in particular, $G_3(n)\le\exp(n^{1+o(1)})$. The two-probe proof avoids Ramsey theory altogether; for larger fixed $q$, we use Ramsey theory only to make the first $q-1$ probes follow a fixed pattern, and then handle the last probe by the same non-Ramsey argument. Somewhat surprisingly, for each fixed $q$, we also show that implicit membership is as hard as implicit search up to a polynomial loss in universe size. Implicit search must return the cell containing $x$ when present and reject otherwise. For the analogous search threshold $H_q(n)$, we prove $H_q(n)\le G_q(n)\le n^q(H_q(n)+1)^{q+1}$ for every $q,n$. Thus, for every fixed $q$, one threshold is at most $\exp(n^{O(1)})$ if and only if the other is. The proofs were first generated by ChatGPT 5.5 Pro without mathematical hints; the membership-search equivalence emerged while pursuing an improved four-probe bound. The authors have validated and edited the proofs and assume responsibility for all content. Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS) Cite as: arXiv:2609.14032 [cs.DS] (or arXiv:2609.14032v1 [cs.DS] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14032 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Songhua He [view email] [v1] Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:32:41 UTC (25 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Should Tables Be Sorted? Revisited with a Large Language Model, by Songhua He View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.DS new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)