最新资讯
dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

测试使用大型语言模型从治疗会话转录文本创建个性化网络的效用:一项概念验证研究

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文开发了一条端到端流水线,用 LLM 从治疗会话转录文本自动生成来访者个性化网络,以支持个案概念化与治疗规划。研究标注了 77 份治疗转录(N=6)中的 8028 条话语,先识别临床相关过程(二分类)及其维度(多标签分类),再通过两步法将过程聚类为有临床意义的簇并生成标签,最后生成簇间连接。评估结果总体支持模型可用性,但评分者间一致性从差到较好不等;定性检查显示生成的网络与原始研究数据一致。作者认为基于 LLM 从治疗转录构建网络具有可行性,但尚需研究其能否改善治疗结果,以及与统计估计网络等其他个性化方法的比较。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 概念验证研究,提出从治疗会话转录文本自动生成来访者个性化网络的端到端流水线:标注 77 份转录、8028 条话语,先做临床相关过程的二分类与维度多标签分类,再用两步法聚类并生成标签,最后生成簇间连接。作者自述评估总体支持模型可用性,但评分者间一致性从差到较好不等,且明确表示尚需研究这些网络能否改善治疗结果、与统计估计网络相比如何,因此属于可行性验证而非疗效证据。对 LLM 在心理健康与结构化临床信息抽取方向有参考价值,但样本仅 6 名来访者、结论不确定,产业落地价值有限。

62

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2512.05836 (cs) [Submitted on 5 Dec 2025 (v1), last revised 25 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Testing the Utility of Using Large Language Models to Create Personalized Networks From Therapy Session Transcripts: A Proof of Concept Study Authors:Clarissa W. Ong, Hiba Arnaout, Kate Sheehan, Estella Fox, Eugen Owtscharow, Iryna Gurevych View a PDF of the paper titled Testing the Utility of Using Large Language Models to Create Personalized Networks From Therapy Session Transcripts: A Proof of Concept Study, by Clarissa W. Ong and 5 other authors View PDF Abstract:Recent advances in psychotherapy have focused on treatment personalization, such as by selecting treatment modules based on individual networks. However, estimating personalized networks typically requires intensive longitudinal data, which is not always feasible to collect. A solution to increase scalability of network-driven treatment personalization is leveraging large language models (LLMs). In this study, we developed an end-to-end pipeline for automatically generating client networks to support case conceptualization and treatment planning. We annotated 8,028 utterances from 77 therapy transcripts (N = 6). In the first stage of the pipeline, we identified clinically relevant processes (binary classification) and their corresponding dimensions (multi-label classification). Then, we introduced a two-step method that grouped the processes into clinically meaningful clusters and generated labels for the clusters. Finally, we generated connections between clusters. Evaluation results generally supported model utility, however, interrater agreement on model performance metrics was inconsistent, ranging from poor to substantial. Qualitative examination of the networks indicated consistency with original study data. Given coherence and interpretability of the generated networks, developing networks from therapy transcripts using LLMs appears to be feasible. Nonetheless, more research is needed to examine whether these networks improve treatment outcomes, including relative to other methods of treatment personalization, such as statistically estimated networks. Potential use cases and limitations of our pipeline are discussed. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2512.05836 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2512.05836v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05836 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Hiba Arnaout [view email] [v1] Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:12:12 UTC (416 KB) [v2] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:24:54 UTC (1,797 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Testing the Utility of Using Large Language Models to Create Personalized Networks From Therapy Session Transcripts: A Proof of Concept Study, by Clarissa W. Ong and 5 other authors View PDF view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2025-12 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容