最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

基于知识的多智能体 LLM 轨迹零重放调试

原文 我的收藏

该论文将多智能体 LLM 系统的长执行轨迹调试建模为基于知识的决策支持问题:把轨迹编译为覆盖路由、记忆、工具调用、不确定性和潜在证据的结构化事件知识图谱,并用轻量预测器 BranchPoint-Latent 在固定预算下预测哪些事件会被反事实重放 oracle 标记为高影响,从而避免线性增长的重放成本。在 37 个轨迹族上校准后,单个 learning-to-rank 梯度提升预测器将留出族的 Branch Recall@5 从 0.73 提升至 0.93,且不消耗 oracle 重放。作者同时刻画了廉价图中心性何时足够、何时需要学习证据,并声明不主张普遍优势。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.SE/cs.AI),提出将多智能体 LLM 执行轨迹调试转化为基于知识图谱的决策支持问题,用 BranchPoint-Latent 预测器在零重放成本下预测反事实高影响事件。摘要给出具体量化结果:在 37 个轨迹族上,留出族 Branch Recall@5 从 0.73 提升到 0.93,并明确说明不主张普遍优势、刻画了廉价图中心性何时足够。局限在于仅基于摘要,未提供代码、数据集规模或独立复现证据,且作者自述不提出新的 replay oracle,效果依赖确定性 replay oracle 的校准。

78

正文

Computer Science > Software Engineering arXiv:2606.14805 (cs) [Submitted on 11 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 26 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Knowledge-Based Zero-Replay Debugging of Multi-Agent LLM Traces Authors:Hyeonjeong Cha, Daein Weon, Dong Ho Kang View a PDF of the paper titled Knowledge-Based Zero-Replay Debugging of Multi-Agent LLM Traces, by Hyeonjeong Cha and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Reliable operation of multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems depends on debugging long execution traces, where the few causally decisive events are buried in unstructured logs of messages, routes, memory writes, and tool calls. The standard tool is counterfactual replay (rewind, edit, and re-run the trajectory to measure each event's effect), but its cost grows linearly with the number of candidate events, making exhaustive replay infeasible at scale. We frame trace debugging as a knowledge-based decision-support problem. Each trace is compiled into a structured event knowledge graph over routing, memory, tool-use, uncertainty, and latent evidence, and a calibrated predictor decides where a scarce replay budget should be spent. We do not propose a new replay oracle; we propose a method to predict its results without paying the replay cost. We formulate zero-replay counterfactual-effect prediction: given a trace under a fixed budget, predict which events the oracle would mark high-effect before any replay is performed. BranchPoint-Latent is a lightweight predictor over observable, structural, uncertainty, and latent features of the knowledge graph. Calibrated against a deterministic replay oracle across 37 trace families, a single learning-to-rank gradient-boosted predictor raises per-trace localization (Branch Recall@5) from 0.73 to 0.93 on held-out families at zero oracle-replay cost. Rather than claiming universal dominance, we characterize when cheap graph centrality suffices and when learned evidence is necessary. The result is an auditable, cost-efficient decision-support system for AI-reliability debugging, positioned explicitly on the cost-accuracy frontier with reproducible artifacts. Comments: Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ACM classes: I.2.11; I.2.6; D.2.5 Cite as: arXiv:2606.14805 [cs.SE] (or arXiv:2606.14805v2 [cs.SE] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14805 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Dong Ho Kang Dr. [view email] [v1] Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:34:39 UTC (19 KB) [v2] Sat, 26 Sep 2026 17:18:32 UTC (19 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Knowledge-Based Zero-Replay Debugging of Multi-Agent LLM Traces, by Hyeonjeong Cha and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.SE new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 基于知识的多智能体 LLM 轨迹零重放调试 09-29 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容