最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

MUSE:面向情境教育中多模态理解的大型视觉语言模型基准测试

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 MUSE 基准,用于评估大型视觉语言模型在情境教育应用中对艺术图像的理解能力。MUSE 将图像标注与问题生成解耦,可在降低标注成本的同时生成难度可控的多样化任务,共包含十二项任务,覆盖视觉感知、语义与情感解读、文化理解及组合推理,并特意选取以新加坡和东南亚多元文化语境为主、兼顾西方艺术传统的艺术图像,涵盖多种主题与难度。对开源与专有模型的评测显示,各能力维度差距明显,情感解读与组合推理尤为突出;分析还总结了常见失败模式与构建可信教育多模态模型的关键挑战。作者希望 MUSE 成为推进情境教育多模态理解的标准化基准。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新提交的基准论文(arXiv:2609.19088,2026-09-16 提交),提出 MUSE 基准,用于评估大型视觉语言模型在情境教育中对艺术图像的多模态理解。其具体新信息是:将图像标注与问题生成解耦,从而以可控难度生成十二类任务,覆盖视觉感知、语义与情感解读、文化理解与组合推理,并刻意纳入新加坡及东南亚多元文化语境与西方艺术传统。论文报告开源与专有模型在能力维度上存在显著差距,尤其在情感解读与组合推理上,并归纳了常见失败模式。局限在于目前仅有摘要级证据,未提供具体分数、模型清单与数据规模,实际效果需查阅全文验证;属于基准/评测类工作,对教育场景多模态落地有参考价值,但非模型能力突破。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.19088 (cs) [Submitted on 16 Sep 2026] Title:MUSE: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Multi-Modal Understanding in Situated Education Authors:Luyao Zhu, Xun Wei Yee, Wei Li, Mun Thye Mak, Wee Siong Ng View a PDF of the paper titled MUSE: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Multi-Modal Understanding in Situated Education, by Luyao Zhu and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large vision-language models have achieved remarkable progress in multi-modal understanding, yet their capabilities in educational settings remain insufficiently evaluated. In AI-assisted language learning, models must interpret artistic imagery, understand its semantic, affective, and cultural content, and reason about visual context to support meaningful interaction. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on real-world images or domain-specific educational reasoning, providing limited coverage of artistic educational content. To address this gap, we introduce MUSE, a benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models on artistic image understanding in situated educational applications. MUSE decouples image annotation from question generation, enabling diverse tasks with controllable difficulty while reducing annotation effort. It comprises twelve tasks spanning visual perception, semantic and affective interpretation, culture understanding, and compositional reasoning, together with diverse artistic images deliberately curated to center Singaporean and Southeast Asian multicultural contexts alongside Western art traditions, covering multiple themes and difficulty levels. Evaluation of open-source and proprietary models reveals substantial disparities across capability dimensions, particularly in affective interpretation and compositional reasoning. Our analysis further identifies common failure modes and key challenges for developing trustworthy multi-modal models for education. We hope MUSE will serve as a standardized benchmark for advancing multi-modal understanding in situated educational applications. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.19088 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19088v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19088 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Luyao Zhu [view email] [v1] Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:26:10 UTC (6,465 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MUSE: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Multi-Modal Understanding in Situated Education, by Luyao Zhu and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容