最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

多语言 LLM 水印真的是多语言的么?通过回译将鲁棒性扩展至 100 多种语言

原文 我的收藏

该论文指出,现有多语言 LLM 水印方法虽声称跨语言鲁棒,但仅在高资源语言上评估,在中低资源语言遭遇翻译攻击时失效,原因在于分词器对相应语言缺少足够全词 token,导致语义聚类失败。作者提出 STEAM:用贝叶斯优化在 126 种候选语言中搜索能最大程度恢复水印强度的回译,兼容任意水印方法,跨分词器与语言鲁棒、非侵入且易扩展。报告平均提升 +0.23 AUC 与 +37%p TPR@1%。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v3,2026-09-11 修订),问题明确、方法具体:指出多语言 LLM 水印在翻译攻击下对中低资源语言不鲁棒,归因于语义聚类在分词器全词 token 不足时失效,并提出 STEAM——用贝叶斯优化在 126 种候选语言中搜索最佳回译以恢复水印强度,报告平均 +0.23 AUC、+37%p TPR@1%。新信息在于对现有方法局限的实证指认与可扩展检测方案;局限是摘要未给出数据集、基线细节与复现条件,增益为作者自报。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2510.18019 (cs) [Submitted on 20 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 11 Sep 2026 (this version, v3)] Title:Is Multilingual LLM Watermarking Truly Multilingual? Scaling Robustness to 100+ Languages via Back-Translation Authors:Asim Mohamed, Martin Gubri View a PDF of the paper titled Is Multilingual LLM Watermarking Truly Multilingual? Scaling Robustness to 100+ Languages via Back-Translation, by Asim Mohamed and Martin Gubri View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multilingual watermarking aims to make large language model (LLM) outputs traceable across languages, yet current methods still fall short. Despite claims of cross-lingual robustness, they are evaluated only on high-resource languages. We show that existing multilingual watermarking methods are not truly multilingual: they fail to remain robust under translation attacks in medium- and low-resource languages. We trace this failure to semantic clustering, which fails when the tokenizer vocabulary contains too few full-word tokens for a given language. To address this, we introduce STEAM, a detection method that uses Bayesian optimisation to search among 126 candidate languages for the back-translation that best recovers the watermark strength. It is compatible with any watermarking method, robust across different tokenizers and languages, non-invasive, and easily extendable to new languages. With average gains of +0.23 AUC and +37%p TPR@1%, STEAM provides a scalable approach toward fairer watermarking across the diversity of languages. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2510.18019 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2510.18019v3 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.18019 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Asim Mohamed [view email] [v1] Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:51:20 UTC (899 KB) [v2] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:52:45 UTC (987 KB) [v3] Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:40:56 UTC (1,060 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Is Multilingual LLM Watermarking Truly Multilingual? Scaling Robustness to 100+ Languages via Back-Translation, by Asim Mohamed and Martin Gubri View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2025-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容