智能体
arxiv.org ·
要事先行:教LLM智能体优先处理必须项而非偏好项
该论文研究多模态大语言模型(MLLM)作为智能体时,在用户复杂结构化需求下的推理能力,区分必须满足和最好满足的需求。作者构建了3649个问题,涵盖电商、预订、地图等场景,发现现有模型常违反必须项。为此提出FTF-rl强化学习方法,显式优化多优先级需求推理,实验表明该方法在多个任务上显著提升成功率,并在逻辑和数学推理基准上具有泛化性。代码和数据集已公开。
AI推荐理由 该论文提出FTF-rl方法,针对LLM智能体在复杂需求场景中优先处理必须项的问题,实验显示在多个任务上提升成功率,代码和数据集已公开,具有实际参考价值。但摘要未提供具体提升幅度,且为预印本,需谨慎评估。
78
正文
计算机科学 > 计算机视觉与模式识别
arXiv:2609.05224 (cs)
[提交于2026年9月4日]
标题:要事先行:教会基于LLM的智能体在“必须满足”之前优先处理“最好满足”
作者:Tianjie Ju, Xinyue Xu, Wanxuan Sun, Lingxiao Diao, Gongshen Liu, Zhuosheng Zhang, Cheng Yang
查看论文PDF,标题为“要事先行:教会基于LLM的智能体在‘必须满足’之前优先处理‘最好满足’”,作者:Tianjie Ju等6人
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
摘要:多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)的最新进展激发了其作为自主智能体执行现实世界任务的巨大潜力。然而,要求智能体满足用户复杂、结构化需求的场景在很大程度上仍未得到充分探索。在这项工作中,我们研究了三种不同需求场景下的推理任务:(i)“必须满足”的需求唯一确定一个可行的解决方案;(ii)多个答案满足“必须满足”的需求,并通过“最好满足”的需求进行优先级排序;(iii)没有候选解决方案满足“必须满足”的需求,在这种情况下,智能体应避免生成响应。我们在3,649个精心构造的问题上评估了最先进的MLLMs,这些问题反映了现实服务场景,包括电子商务、预订以及基于地图或叫车服务。我们的评估显示,现有的MLLMs在所有场景中都表现出灾难性的失败。它们经常误解任务需求,违反“必须满足”的需求,并产生无效的解决方案。为了解决这一关键差距,我们提出了“要事先行强化学习”(FTF-rl),它显式优化了对多优先级用户需求的推理。实验结果表明,与强基线相比,我们的方法显著提高了任务成功率。此外,FTF-rl在流行的逻辑和数学推理任务(包括LogicVista、MathVision和InfoQA)上表现出普遍的有效性。我们的发现表明,增强需求感知推理能力为提升MLLM智能体的泛化能力提供了一条简单而有效的途径。代码和数据集可在以下https URL获取。
评论:
主题:
计算机视觉与模式识别 (cs.CV)
引用为:
arXiv:2609.05224 [cs.CV]
(或
arXiv:2609.05224v1 [cs.CV] 用于此版本)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05224
聚焦了解更多
arXiv发布的DOI通过DataCite(待注册)
提交历史
来自:Tianjie Ju [查看电子邮件]
[v1]
2026年9月4日星期五 14:54:30 UTC (22,738 KB)
全文链接:
访问论文:
查看论文PDF,标题为“要事先行:教会基于LLM的智能体在‘必须满足’之前优先处理‘最好满足’”,作者:Tianjie Ju等6人
查看PDF
HTML(实验性)
TeX源
查看许可证
当前浏览上下文:
cs.CV
新
|
最近
| 2026-09
更改为浏览:
cs
参考文献与引用
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
导出BibTeX引用
加载中...
BibTeX格式引用
×
加载中...
数据由以下提供:
书签
书目工具
书目与引用工具
书目浏览器切换
书目浏览器(什么是浏览器?)
关联论文切换
关联论文(什么是关联论文?)
Litmaps切换
Litmaps(什么是Litmaps?)
scite.ai切换
scite智能引用(什么是智能引用?)
代码、数据、媒体
与本文相关的代码、数据和媒体
alphaXiv切换
alphaXiv(什么是alphaXiv?)
代码链接切换
CatalyzeX论文代码查找器(什么是CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub切换
DagsHub(什么是DagsHub?)
GotitPub切换
Gotit.pub(什么是GotitPub?)
Huggingface切换
Hugging Face(什么是Huggingface?)
ScienceCast切换
ScienceCast(什么是ScienceCast?)
演示
演示
Replicate切换
Replicate(什么是Replicate?)
Spaces切换
Hugging Face Spaces(什么是Spaces?)
Spaces切换
TXYZ.AI(什么是TXYZ.AI?)
相关论文
推荐器与搜索工具
链接到Influence Flower
Influence Flower(什么是Influence Flowers?)
核心推荐器切换
CORE推荐器(什么是CORE?)
作者
会议/期刊
机构
主题
关于arXivLabs
arXivLabs:与社区合作者的实验项目
arXivLabs是一个框架,允许合作者直接在我们的网站上开发和分享新的arXiv功能。
与arXivLabs合作的个人和组织都拥护并接受我们的开放、社区、卓越和用户数据隐私的价值观。arXiv致力于这些价值观,并且只与遵守这些价值观的合作伙伴合作。
有一个能为arXiv社区增加价值的项目想法?了解更多关于arXivLabs的信息。
这篇论文的哪些作者是背书人? |
禁用MathJax(什么是MathJax?)
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
arXiv:2609.05224 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026]
Title:First Things First: Teaching LLM-Based Agents to Prioritize Must-Haves before Nice-to-Haves
Authors:Tianjie Ju, Xinyue Xu, Wanxuan Sun, Lingxiao Diao, Gongshen Liu, Zhuosheng Zhang, Cheng Yang
View a PDF of the paper titled First Things First: Teaching LLM-Based Agents to Prioritize Must-Haves before Nice-to-Haves, by Tianjie Ju and 6 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recent progress in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has fueled significant enthusiasm in their potential to act as autonomous agents for real-world tasks. However, scenarios requiring agents to fulfill users' complex, structured requirements remain largely underexplored. In this work, we examine reasoning tasks under three distinct requirement scenarios: (i) Must-have requirements uniquely determine a unique feasible solution; (ii) Multiple answers satisfy the must-have requirements and are prioritized via the nice-to-have requirements; and (iii) No candidate solution satisfies the must-have requirements, in which case the agent should abstain from generating a response. We evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs on 3,649 carefully constructed problems that reflect realistic service scenarios, including e-commerce, booking, and map-based or ride-hailing. Our evaluation reveals that existing MLLMs exhibit catastrophic failures in all scenarios. They frequently misinterpret task requirements, violate must-have requirements, and produce invalid solutions. To address this critical gap, we propose First Things First Reinforcement Learning FTF-rl that explicitly optimizes reasoning over multi-priority user requirements. Experimental results show that our method substantially improves the task success rate compared to strong baselines. Moreover, FTF-rl yields general effectiveness on popular logical and mathematical reasoning tasks, including LogicVista, MathVision, and InfoQA. Our findings suggest that enhancing requirement-aware reasoning capability provides a simple yet effective pathway to improve generalization of MLLM agents. Code and dataset are available at this https URL.
Comments:
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.05224 [cs.CV]
(or
arXiv:2609.05224v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05224
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Tianjie Ju [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:54:30 UTC (22,738 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled First Things First: Teaching LLM-Based Agents to Prioritize Must-Haves before Nice-to-Haves, by Tianjie Ju and 6 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)