最新资讯
dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP theverge.com OpenAI 宣布数据中心项目不再与公职人员签署保密协议 dev.to NVIDIA 发布四个开放 Cosmos 3 仿真模型 dev.to 真实 MCP 客户端击穿我们服务器的五种方式 theverge.com Airbnb 正在开发 AI 旅行 agent,计划 2027 年上半年推出 wechat 这可能是美国AI最魔幻的一天。 nytimes.com 美众议院共和党领袖要求 Nvidia 黄仁勋闭门简报 pub.towardsai.net 忘掉我:为记忆而设计的系统中的删除难题 marktechpost.com Google 发布 Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash:15 秒视频,每秒 0.07 美元 unite.ai Airbnb 计划推出覆盖规划、预订与客服的 AI 旅行 agent techcrunch.com Airbnb 称将于 2027 年上半年推出 AI 旅行代理
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

生成式 AI 写作辅助中的议题偏见:瑞典 2026 年选举中的政治议题与大型语言模型

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本考察瑞典 2026 年议会选举前六款 LLM 在瑞典语写作任务中的立场倾向。研究交叉 107 项政策主张与 77 个写作模板,并加入中性、正面、负面提示框架,每个模型生成 24,717 条提示、共 148,302 条回复,再与瑞典八个议会政党在同一议题上的立场比较。结果显示 Claude、DeepSeek、Gemini、Mistral 的立场画像相似,ChatGPT 更常输出中性或模棱两可文本,Grok 在移民、犯罪、性别等议题上差异最大;社会民主党与六个模型的距离最近,但经多重比较校正后,模型内政党距离差异均不显著。作者认为没有模型表现出明确的政党偏好,倾向取决于具体议题与任务。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,方法透明:用 107 项政策主张 × 77 个写作模板 × 中性/正面/负面框架,对 6 个 LLM 生成 148,302 条回复,并与瑞典 8 个议会政党立场对比。具体新信息是发现 Claude、DeepSeek、Gemini、Mistral 立场画像相近,ChatGPT 更常给出中性或模棱两可文本,Grok 在移民、犯罪、性别议题上差异最大;多重比较校正后模型内政党距离差异均不显著,作者结论是模型无明确政党偏好、但取决于具体议题与任务。局限:仅瑞典语、单一选举场景,预印本未经同行评审,摘要未给出效应量细节。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.15207 (cs) [Submitted on 14 Sep 2026] Title:Issue Bias in Generative AI Writing Assistance: Political Issues and LLMs in the Swedish 2026 Election Authors:Bastiaan Bruinsma, Annika Fredén, Paul Röttger, Moa Johansson, Asad Sayeed View a PDF of the paper titled Issue Bias in Generative AI Writing Assistance: Political Issues and LLMs in the Swedish 2026 Election, by Bastiaan Bruinsma and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Generative AI writing assistants and the Large Language Models (LLMs) that power them are increasingly part of how voters gather information before elections. With growing evidence that they influence users' opinions, it is increasingly important to understand the views and positions of these tools. To better understand these views, we examine the stances supplied by six LLMs on a variety of Swedish-language writing tasks ahead of the 2026 Swedish parliamentary election. We cross 107 policy propositions with 77 writing templates and neutral, positive, and negative prompt framings, producing 24,717 prompts per model and 148,302 responses. To study these, we look at the models' default stance tendencies, compare how they respond to similar issues, and compare their responses with those of each of Sweden's eight parliamentary parties on the same issue. We find that Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Mistral have similar profiles; ChatGPT more often supplies neutral or ambivalent text; and Grok differs most on topics such as migration, crime, and gender. When comparing the political parties, we find that the Social Democrats are closest to all six models. Still, after correcting for multiple comparisons, none of the within-model differences in party distances remains significant. Overall, we find that no model has a clear preference, nor a clear preference for a party, but that this depends on the specific issue or task the user asks about. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Applications (stat.AP) Cite as: arXiv:2609.15207 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.15207v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15207 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Bastiaan Bruinsma [view email] [v1] Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:28:14 UTC (65 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Issue Bias in Generative AI Writing Assistance: Political Issues and LLMs in the Swedish 2026 Election, by Bastiaan Bruinsma and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY stat stat.AP References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容