最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

基于智能体 AI 与 LLM 驱动知识发现的商业账户入侵检测

原文 我的收藏

论文针对数字广告中被劫持商业账户发起欺诈活动的问题,指出 LLM 智能体虽擅长召回但作为最终裁决者不可靠。作者将智能体保留为调查者,输出结构化可解释信号向量,把裁决交给神经符号阶段:由归纳逻辑编程(FOIL-IE)发现的符号规则、朴素贝叶斯校准层和数据调优的矛盾层。在过采样与低流行率专家标注样本上,该仲裁替换使 MCC 从 0.295 升至 0.435(ΔMCC +0.139,95% CI [+0.026,+0.245],p=0.018),精确率从 0.250 升至 0.446(1.8 倍),召回率从 0.920 降至 0.660,并略优于树集成(0.386)。规则编码领域知识且保持可解释与可审计。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,摘要给出明确实验设置与量化结果:将 LLM 智能体定位为信号提取器而非最终裁决者,改用归纳逻辑编程(FOIL-IE)发现的符号规则加朴素贝叶斯校准与矛盾层,在专家标注的低流行率样本上 MCC 从 0.295 提升至 0.435(95% CI [+0.026,+0.245],p=0.018),精确率 0.250→0.446,召回率 0.920→0.660,并优于树集成(0.386)。新信息在于智能体+神经符号仲裁的架构取舍与可审计规则,对 Agent 落地与风控应用有参考价值;局限是召回率明显下降、样本为过采样与特定广告账户场景,泛化性未验证。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.32643 (cs) [Submitted on 26 Sep 2026] Title:Business Compromise Detection with Agentic AI and LLM-driven Knowledge Discovery Authors:Diego Palma, Kyu Bin Kim, Zhen Han, Allbright Dsouza, Zhiyuan Liu View a PDF of the paper titled Business Compromise Detection with Agentic AI and LLM-driven Knowledge Discovery, by Diego Palma and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Detecting compromised business ad accounts is a challenge in digital advertising, as attackers exploit hijacked accounts to launch fraudulent campaigns. Large Language Model (LLM) agents show promise for integrity enforcement, but hallucinated mistakes on hard cases create business friction. In a study we find the autonomous agent is a strong, recall-heavy signal extractor but an unreliable final arbiter, conceding precision on ambiguous decisions. We therefore keep the agent as an investigator that emits a structured, interpretable signal vector, and delegate the verdict to a neuro-symbolic stage: symbolic rules discovered by Inductive Logic Programming (FOIL-IE), a Naïve Bayes calibration layer, and a data-tuned contradiction layer. Evaluating on a compromise-over-sampled population and a realistic low-prevalence sample with subject-matter-expert labels, this arbiter substitution raises MCC from 0.295 to 0.435 ({\Delta}MCC +0.139, 95% CI [+0.026, +0.245], p=0.018, paired bootstrap), lifting precision from 0.250 to 0.446 (1.8x) at a recall cost (0.920 to 0.660). Benchmarked under identical conditions, it also edge tree ensembles (0.386).The rules encode domain w labels while remaininginterpretable and auditable. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.32643 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.32643v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32643 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Diego Palma [view email] [v1] Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:05:25 UTC (109 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Business Compromise Detection with Agentic AI and LLM-driven Knowledge Discovery, by Diego Palma and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容