最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

VoxMem:大型音频语言模型中的多模态记忆基准测试

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 VoxMem 基准,用于评测大型音频语言模型(LALM)的语音对话记忆能力。基准包含 3196 个评测实例、34743 段语音会话(177 小时),沿两条轴构建分类:四类声学证据(语音语义、说话人身份、副语言线索、环境声)与四类记忆操作(信息抽取、多会话推理、时序追踪、答案拒答),并覆盖 8K 至 64K token 的上下文预算。对 15 个 LALM 的评测显示,在 32K 上下文下没有模型超过 40%;模型对“说了什么”的保留明显优于“谁说的、怎么说的、有什么声音”,该差距在复杂操作和更长历史下进一步扩大,并表现为不同证据类型下性质不同的失败模式。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新提交论文(2026-09-26),提出 VoxMem 基准,覆盖 3196 个评测实例、34743 段语音会话(177 小时),按四类声学证据(语音语义、说话人身份、副语言线索、环境声)与四类记忆操作(信息抽取、多会话推理、时序追踪、拒答)构建分类体系,并测试 15 个大型音频语言模型,报告在 32K 上下文下无一模型超过 40%。具体新信息是首个同时刻画声学证据与记忆操作、且跨多会话的语音记忆评测基准,并给出模型在说话人身份、副语言和可听内容上保留能力明显弱于文本语义的量化结论;局限是仅依据摘要,未提供各模型逐项得分与数据构建细节,且基准本身不证明任何模型的实际部署效果。

78

正文

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Audio and Speech Processing arXiv:2609.32607 (eess) [Submitted on 26 Sep 2026] Title:VoxMem: Benchmarking Multimodal Memory in Large Audio Language Models Authors:Yang Xiao, Vidhyasaharan Sethu, Eun-Jung Holden, Ting Dang View a PDF of the paper titled VoxMem: Benchmarking Multimodal Memory in Large Audio Language Models, by Yang Xiao and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Spoken conversational systems must recover information from prior interactions (i.e., memory), yet relevant information in speech extends beyond what was said to who said it, how it was spoken, and what was audible, information that exists only in the audio signal and cannot be recovered from a transcript. Beyond what to remember, memory also demands diverse operations: retrieving a single fact, integrating evidence across turns, tracking an evolving state. Real interactions further unfold across sessions, meaning information accumulates across distinct episodes rather than a single continuous recording. Existing benchmarks fall short on all three dimensions: they focus primarily on lexical content, adopt limited and ad hoc memory operations, and treat memory as a single-session problem. We argue that principled memory evaluation requires jointly characterizing the acoustic evidence to be retained and the operations applied to it, and introduce a taxonomy along these two axes. Building on this taxonomy, we present VoxMem: 3,196 evaluation instances over 34,743 spoken sessions (177 hours) crossing four acoustic evidence types (speech semantics, speaker identity, paralinguistic cues, environmental sound) with four memory operations (information extraction, multi-session reasoning, temporal tracking, and answer refusal), grounded in multi-session histories and stratified across context budgets from 8K to 64K tokens. Evaluating 15 LALMs, no model exceeds 40% at 32K. Models retain what was said far better than who said it, how, or what was audible, a gap that widens for complex operations, grows with history length, and manifests as qualitatively distinct failure modes across evidence types. VoxMem aims to provide a foundation to measure and drive progress on the full scope of spoken conversational memory. Comments: Subjects: Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Sound (cs.SD) Cite as: arXiv:2609.32607 [eess.AS] (or arXiv:2609.32607v1 [eess.AS] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32607 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yang Xiao [view email] [v1] Sat, 26 Sep 2026 13:27:12 UTC (28,079 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled VoxMem: Benchmarking Multimodal Memory in Large Audio Language Models, by Yang Xiao and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: eess.AS new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.SD eess References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容