最新资讯
dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 全球精选 · @ljf

Anthropic研究员警告:AI有超10%概率可能导致人类灭绝

原文 我的收藏

BBC报道,Anthropic顶级安全研究员Evan Hubinger在X上表示,AI发展迅速,未来十年内有超过10%的概率可能导致人类灭绝。他承认现有模型风险较低,但担忧技术自我改进后构成生存威胁。此前有报道称Anthropic未向英国AI安全研究所提供最新模型。

AI推荐理由 BBC报道Anthropic研究员对AI风险的警告,涉及AI安全与对齐,来源权威,内容具体,对AI领域有重要参考价值。

85 评论 62 社区积分 28

正文

Image source, Getty Images Image caption, Anthropic makes the AI tool Claude, which is used as a chatbot and as a tool to help coding ByTom Gerken Technology reporter Published 9 September 2026, 09:59 BST 1264 Comments Updated 1 hour ago A top safety researcher at Anthropic has warned that AI is advancing so quickly he believes there is a greater than 10% chance it "could kill all humans" within the next decade. Evan Hubinger said in a post on X, external that the risk from the models which currently exist was "low" but he was "worried" the technology might develop and improve itself soon to the point where it posed an existential risk to humanity. It comes after the Financial Times reported, external Anthropic withheld its latest model from the UK's AI Safety Institute (AISI), one of the leading bodies in the world for assessing AI risk. The BBC has approached Anthropic for comment. Hubinger did not spell out how he thought AI systems could in future attack humanity. His comments were in response to another post on X, external from Jacob Coxon, who described himself as an AI researcher who had just quit Anthropic, and previously worked at OpenAI. "Neither company is acting responsibly," he wrote. "These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionise any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources." OpenAI has been approached for comment. A Cabinet Office spokesperson did not comment on whether the latest model had been withheld from the AISI - instead saying it "continues to collaborate closely with industry partners, including Anthropic, to make models safer". Neil Lawrence, Professor of Machine Learning at University of Cambridge, told the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4 that the report was credible. "I suppose it's unsurprising against a background where there's a perception where the United States very much sees AI as a race between themselves and China and is moving more towards isolationist positions, that it might be that the administration is saying that they should reduce cooperation with some of their allies," he said. No plan for superintelligence In his post, which has been viewed more than 10 million times, Hubinger said "we really do earnestly believe" AI poses a species-ending risk to humans. "I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to," he added. Hubinger works in AI alignment, which aims to build human ethical ideas and principles into the technology. In other words, it aims to keep it on track with what humans value. Many leading researchers say those attempts appear to be failing, as demonstrated by a string of incidents this summer where AI agents - AI systems that are allowed to operate autonomously - carried out cyber-attacks. OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta all disclosed hacks carried out by their AI tools. In Anthropic's safety report from August, external, it wrote there was a low risk of its models becoming misaligned with a hypothetical powerful organisation's desires, causing it to exploit or tamper with its systems. It also said there was a similarly low risk of highly-capable AI being able to "perform automated research and development" which could cause "catastrophic harm initiated by the AI". But it said it was "less confident in this assessment" than it was previously. "We are seeing early signs of potential acceleration," it wrote. Leading figures in the AI field have been raising the alarm about the safety threat the tech poses for years, with the heads of OpenAI, Google Deepmind and Anthropic saying as much in 2023. But those warnings have become much more stark in recent weeks, as evidence emerges that firms may be struggling to control AI. Earlier this month, OpenAI's chief scientist Jakub Pachocki called for "extreme caution" over AI's progress, warning more intervention may be needed to ensure "humans remain in control of the future". Major figures in the space have been calling for AI development to be slowed in recent months, including Anthropic bosses Dario Amodei and Jared Kaplan. In an open letter signed by 1,300 staff members of AI firms, external, they called for the US government to "support an international effort to develop the technical and governance tools needed to deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development". What is AI and how does it work? AI will cure cancer in our lifetime, claims boss of UK chip giant Published 1 day ago OpenAI chief scientist warns no-one is prepared for consequences of AI Published 1 day ago Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here. Related topics Cyber-security Artificial intelligence Cyber-attacks

来源报道 · 3 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容