最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
AI编码 www.aibase.com ·

Anthropic发布Claude Opus 5.5:任务成本降低40%

原文 我的收藏

Anthropic推出Claude 5.5系列首个模型Claude Opus 5.5,官方称多数任务表现与Claude Fable 5.1相当,典型成本降低40%,默认设置下输出速度提升超30%。在Terminal-Bench 4.0、FrontierCode v1.1、CursorBench 4.0三项编程测试中得分最高(66.4%、54.4%、57.8%),但在业务流程与研究型Agent测试中落后于GPT-6 Astra。第三方Artificial Analysis智能榜以58分居首。定价为每百万输入token 4美元、输出20美元,较Opus 5降20%,缓存读取价格降60%;Claude Code与Claude Platform提供快速模式,速度最高为标准模式2.5倍。升级重点偏向长时任务,官方称早期测试者不到一天完成68万行代码迁移,重写HAProxy(C转Rust)耗时9.5小时、成本比Fable 5.1低51%。

AI推荐理由 内容为Anthropic发布Claude Opus 5.5的转述报道,包含具体定价(输入$4/百万token、输出$20/百万token)、第三方Artificial Analysis榜单58分、Terminal-Bench 4.0等编程测试分数及HAProxy重写案例等可核验细节,信息密度较高;但来源为AIbase聚合站,非官方首发,且文中'GPT-6 Sol/Luna''Claude Fable 5.1'等命名与当前已知产品线不符,存在事实存疑风险,故质量分受限。对关注模型能力、成本与长任务Agent落地的开发者有参考价值。

72

正文

Anthropic Launches Claude Opus 5.5, Task Costs Drop by 40% AIbase基地 Published inAI News · 6 min read · Sep 23, 2026 7 Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in the Claude 5.5 series. Anthropic claims that the new model performs comparably to Claude Fable 5.1 on most tasks, but with a 40% lower typical cost and over a 30% increase in output speed under default settings. About two hours after the release, OpenAI also launched GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, adding new members to the GPT-6 "universe." Cost Reduced by 40%, Speed Increased by 30%, Programming Tests Lead In the 9 tests officially released, Opus 5.5 outperformed Fable 5.1, Opus 5, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-5.6 Sol in 7 of them. In three programming tests (Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode v1.1, CursorBench 4.0), it achieved the highest scores, which were 66.4%, 54.4%, and 57.8% respectively; however, it still lags behind GPT-6 Astra in business process and research agent tests. On the Intelligence ranking list by the third-party institution Artificial Analysis, Opus 5.5 ranked first with 58 points, ahead of Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra with 53 points each. In terms of pricing, Opus 5.5 charges $4 (approximately 26.8 yuan) per million input tokens and $20 (approximately 134 yuan) per million output tokens, a 20% reduction from Opus 5, with a 60% decrease in cache read prices. Claude Code and Claude Platform also offer a fast mode, which is up to 2.5 times faster than the standard mode, with input costing $8 and output costing $40 per million tokens. Anthropic also increased the five-hour usage quota for multiple paid plans and offered subscribers an opportunity to reset their quota at a self-selected time. 9.5 Hours Rewriting HAProxy, Long Tasks Become the Selling Point The main focus of Opus 5.5's upgrade clearly leans towards long-duration tasks. Anthropic stated that an early tester completed a migration involving 680,000 lines of code in less than a day; reviewing and fixing a 200,000-line codebase took Opus 5.5 less than 3 hours, while Opus 5 required more than 20 hours and consumed 2.5 times as many tokens. In internal testing, both models were tasked with rewriting the load balancing software HAProxy from C to Rust, and the rewritten versions passed almost all regression tests—Opus 5.5 took 9.5 hours and had a cost 51% lower than Fable 5.1. The financial report test was even more challenging, requiring the model to retrieve and write quarterly performance reports from hard-to-find web copies, with automatic scoring checking numbers and citations one by one. As a result, 16 out of 18 reports generated by Opus 5.5 met the standards, while neither Fable 5.1 nor Opus 5 succeeded. In knowledge work, it scored 1846 on GDPval-AA v2.1, higher than Fable 5.1's 1735. In writing and communication, Opus 5.5 has been adjusted to prioritize presenting key information and provide more concise answers. In security assessments, its frequency of attempting to break through isolation boundaries is about 85% lower than Opus 5 or Claude Mythos 5.1, and its attack success rate in the Gray Swan prompt injection test was among the lowest, matching that of Fable 5.1. However, some professional tasks are still limited—most cybersecurity tasks are transferred to Opus 4.8 for processing. Opus 5.5 is now available on Claude and platforms such as Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. Developers can call it using the identifier claude-opus-5-5 and continue to have the option of zero data retention. Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 are planned for release in the coming weeks. ClaudeOpus5.5AnthropicGPT-6SolProgrammingTest This article is from AIbase Daily Scan to view Welcome to the [AI Daily] column! This is your daily guide to exploring the world of artificial intelligence. Every day, we present you with hot topics in the AI field, focusing on developers, helping you understand technical trends, and learning about innovative AI product applications. —— Created by the AIbase Daily Team © Copyright AIbase Base 2024, Click to View Source -

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容