最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

通过自反馈强化学习进行大语言模型后训练

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 RLSF(Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback)后训练阶段:从冻结的 LLM 生成多条 Chain-of-Thought 解码束,计算每个最终答案片段的置信度并据此排序,构造合成偏好数据,再用标准偏好优化微调策略,全程无需人工标签、金标准答案或外部奖励。作者称该方法可同时改善模型概率估计的校准性并增强逐步推理,在算术推理和多项选择题上取得提升,将模型自身不确定性转化为结构化自反馈。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-15 修订),提出 RLSF 后训练方法:用冻结 LLM 生成多条 CoT 解码束,以模型自身对答案片段的置信度排序构造合成偏好,再通过标准偏好优化微调,无需人工标注、金标准答案或外部奖励。摘要称其在算术推理和多项选择题上同时改善概率校准与逐步推理。属方法层面的新信息,对 LLM 后训练与推理可靠性有参考价值;但仅依据摘要,未提供具体数据集、基线对比数值或复现证据,实际效果需看全文验证。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2507.21931 (cs) [Submitted on 29 Jul 2025 (v1), last revised 15 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback Authors:Carel van Niekerk, Renato Vukovic, Benjamin Ruppik, Hsien-chin Lin, Shutong Feng, Milica Gašić View a PDF of the paper titled Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback, by Carel van Niekerk and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce plausible but poorly-calibrated answers, limiting their reliability on reasoning-intensive tasks. Recent research suggests that Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning paths are inherent in pre-trained LLMs and can be elicited by simply altering the decoding process, where the presence of a CoT path correlates with higher answer confidence. Building on these insights, we present Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback (RLSF), a post-training stage that utilises the model's intrinsic confidence as a self-generated reward. By generating multiple CoT decoding beams from a frozen LLM, we compute the confidence of each final answer span and rank the resulting traces accordingly to create synthetic preferences. These preferences are subsequently utilised to fine-tune the policy through standard preference optimisation, requiring no human labels, gold answers, or externally curated rewards. RLSF simultaneously (i) refines the model's probability estimates--restoring well-behaved calibration--and (ii) strengthens step-by-step reasoning, yielding improved performance on arithmetic reasoning and multiple-choice question answering. By converting a model's own uncertainty into structured self-feedback, RLSF affirms reinforcement learning on intrinsic model behaviour as a principled and data-efficient component of the LLM post-training pipeline. Our results demonstrate that leveraging these inherent reasoning capabilities provides a robust path for enhancing model reliability without manual prompt engineering or external supervision. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2507.21931 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2507.21931v2 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.21931 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Renato Vukovic [view email] [v1] Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:46:26 UTC (229 KB) [v2] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:56:06 UTC (775 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback, by Carel van Niekerk and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2025-07 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 通过自反馈强化学习进行大语言模型后训练 09-16 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容