最新资讯
dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP theverge.com OpenAI 宣布数据中心项目不再与公职人员签署保密协议 dev.to NVIDIA 发布四个开放 Cosmos 3 仿真模型 dev.to 真实 MCP 客户端击穿我们服务器的五种方式 theverge.com Airbnb 正在开发 AI 旅行 agent,计划 2027 年上半年推出 wechat 这可能是美国AI最魔幻的一天。 nytimes.com 美众议院共和党领袖要求 Nvidia 黄仁勋闭门简报 pub.towardsai.net 忘掉我:为记忆而设计的系统中的删除难题 marktechpost.com Google 发布 Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash:15 秒视频,每秒 0.07 美元 unite.ai Airbnb 计划推出覆盖规划、预订与客服的 AI 旅行 agent techcrunch.com Airbnb 称将于 2027 年上半年推出 AI 旅行代理
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

分析针对智能体 AI 系统的模型引导自动化攻击的防御性误导

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文研究智能体 AI 面临的提示注入与越狱攻击,指出攻击者正采用模型引导的自动化来扩展探测、提示优化和响应评估。作者用概率模型分析攻防设置,认为传统“检测并阻断”防御会因可预测的拒绝文本为自动搜索提供反馈,使攻击成功率(ASR)随查询预算增长趋近于 1;而“检测并误导”策略通过返回受控、非操作性响应诱导攻击者评判器产生假阳性,可降低其候选的阳性预测值并给出有界的渐近 ASR。作者提出轻量级对话误导方法 CMPE(Contextual Misdirection via Progressive Engagement),在越狱基准上称将估计 ASR 上界降低最多两个数量级,并在 PAIR、GPTFuzz、AutoDAN-Turbo 的端到端实验中几乎消除已验证的攻击成功。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本(cs.CR/cs.AI),作者提出对智能体 AI 的模型引导自动化攻击进行防御性误导的分析框架,并给出 CMPE 概念验证方法。摘要称在 jailbreak 基准上把估计 ASR 上界降低最多两个数量级,并在 PAIR、GPTFuzz、AutoDAN-Turbo 端到端实验中几乎消除已验证的攻击成功。新信息在于把“检测并阻断”改为“检测并误导”,利用攻击者自动评判器的假阳性来限制 ASR;局限是仅为预印本、概念验证,未提供同行评审或独立复现证据,实际部署效果未知。

78

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2606.20470 (cs) [Submitted on 18 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 24 Sep 2026 (this version, v3)] Title:Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems Authors:Reza Soosahabi, Vivek Namsani View a PDF of the paper titled Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems, by Reza Soosahabi and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Agentic AI systems increasingly rely on language-model components to interpret instructions, process external data, invoke tools, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make prompt-injection and jailbreak attacks more consequential, especially as attackers adopt model-guided automation to scale probing, prompt refinement, and response evaluation. This work analyzes the resulting attack-defense setting through a probabilistic model of a target system, its defense mechanism, and the attacker's automated judge. Our analysis shows that conventional detect-and-block defenses can allow attacker success rate (ASR) to approach one as the query budget grows, since predictable refusals provide useful feedback to automated search. We then examine detect-and-misdirect, where detected malicious interactions receive controlled, non-operational responses designed to induce false-positive errors in the attacker's judge. This strategy reduces the positive predictive value of attacker-selected candidates and yields a bounded asymptotic ASR. We evaluate a proof-of-concept realization of this strategy through Contextual Misdirection via Progressive Engagement (CMPE), a lightweight conversational misdirection method designed to replace predictable refusal text with safe but strategically misleading responses in automated jailbreak settings. On jailbreak benchmarks, CMPE reduces estimated ASR upper bounds by up to two orders of magnitude and nearly eliminates verified attack success in end-to-end experiments with PAIR, GPTFuzz, and AutoDAN-Turbo. Comments: Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.20470 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2606.20470v3 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.20470 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Reza Soosahabi [view email] [v1] Thu, 18 Jun 2026 16:50:28 UTC (974 KB) [v2] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:12:34 UTC (988 KB) [v3] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:46:04 UTC (1,063 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems, by Reza Soosahabi and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容